Page 7 of 26 FirstFirst ... 2345678910111217 ... LastLast
Results 121 to 140 of 510

Thread: Perma ban: RJKarl

  1. #121
    So far discussion has been pretty vigorous w/o rj, tbh.
    semi-aquatic like otters be.

  2. #122
    Quote Originally Posted by BeachBumDeac View Post
    Do you think calling someone a piece of shit is the same level of insensitivity as using slave patois?
    I think calling another poster a piece of shit is extremely derogatory and should be beneath any adult. I will leave the relative insensitivity determination to you.

  3. #123
    Quote Originally Posted by TenaciousKory View Post
    I don't know RJs intention either, but what he wrote bears a performance that's figuratively pretty similar to racist shit elsewhere (see "we wuz kangs").

    I'd add that you probably don't need to target an individual to participate in speech targeted against a certain group of people either. Intentionality is important, sure, but it can't be the only metric for evaluating someone's words.
    But you are a person who is studying this and is apparently very familiar with dialect that is being used in white nationalist circles. I feel confident that RJ had no conception of this when he made that statement.

  4. #124
    If Rj is truly gone forever, then Iím not sure what purpose our continuing to talk about him after his board demise serves after this point. I donít think itís any secret that I had a soft spot in my heart for the guy, and Iím tempted to have my wife wife add him on Facebook(as I donít have one) so I can keep up with him(although she may divorce me for the constant deluge of messages that would inevitably follow). Blame whoever or whatever you want, but this place obviously wasnít healthy for him. So perhaps we should just embrace whatever he was to us individually, and move on with our collective board existence.

  5. #125
    Quote Originally Posted by ChrisL68 View Post
    I am looking to RJs intention, and I don't think his primary intention was derogatory towards a black person. It was being derogatory against the person he made the statement against.
    He "made the statement against" me. Because I said the following:

    Quote Originally Posted by wakephan09 View Post
    You're basically a walking fallacy, RJ. This is why even people that agree with your politics push back against your posts.
    The problem with your "RJ's intention" interpretation is that even if simply using "massa" rhetorically is not "derogatory towards a black person", he's still ventriloquizing the voice of an enslaved person to represent his petty grievances in a way that belittles the suffering of enslaved people.

    Even if you are right and RJ's insensitive rather than racist (probably the case) it still doesn't seem like an appropriately proportional response.

  6. #126
    RJ didn't make an appropriately proportional response? Alert the media!

  7. #127
    Quote Originally Posted by ChrisL68 View Post
    RJ didn't make an appropriately proportional response? Alert the media!
    Um, what? Why don't you respond to what I wrote?

  8. #128
    It's clear that in order for there to be peace we're going to need a Team Emo sacrifice

  9. #129
    It is clear that the unanimous Massas stepped on themselves, and they need to decide whether they really mean what theyíve said, in which case we all now understand, or not in which case the board might be able to continue.

  10. #130
    Quote Originally Posted by wakephan09 View Post
    Um, what? Why don't you respond to what I wrote?
    I mean he is rj. He is easily baited into saying outrageous stuff when he perceived himself as being criticized. Personally i don't think the characteristization here that he is going for makes alot of sense.

  11. #131
    Wasnít 1976 supposed to be the honorable, non-partisan party to verify the info from rjís Tier 1 Sauce?

  12. #132
    Quote Originally Posted by BarcaDeac View Post
    Wasnít 1976 supposed to be the honorable, non-partisan party to verify the info from rjís Tier 1 Sauce?
    Honorable? LOL, I am the the one whoís laughed at you all for encouraging him.

  13. #133
    Quote Originally Posted by ChrisL68 View Post
    I think it is generational. We called each other retards in grade school as well.
    So did I, but I learned to stop when I grew up.
    Birds are real.

  14. #134
    Quote Originally Posted by ChrisL68 View Post
    I don't and I agree it is insensitive.

    I also think it insensitive to call somebody a piece of shit or a shitty boomer.
    But what if they are acting like a piece of shit and you are just being descriptive?
    Birds are real.

  15. #135
    Quote Originally Posted by ChrisL68 View Post
    I think calling another poster a piece of shit is extremely derogatory and should be beneath any adult. I will leave the relative insensitivity determination to you.
    I didnít say he was a piece of shit, only that he seemed like one. Donít hyperbolize my intent, look at the original meaning.
    Birds are real.

  16. #136
    Quote Originally Posted by mako1331 View Post
    My man didnít even pull the I have black friends card. He had to go to black clients.
    "Don't worry. My AA clients would keep doing business with me knowing I support the use of that type of language."

  17. #137
    I can't stress enough how utterly soft anyone here is who is behind permanently silencing a guy on the internet. There are plenty of posters here who think it's horseshit. I cannot emphasize enough how mentally weak each and every single one of you mother fuckers are.

    A dude uses an antiquated phrase. Anyone paying attention knows RJ doesn't have a racist bone in his body. You guys suck so fucking bad

  18. #138
    Quote Originally Posted by ChrisL68 View Post
    I mean he is rj. He is easily baited into saying outrageous stuff when he perceived himself as being criticized. Personally i don't think the characteristization here that he is going for makes alot of sense.
    Yes, I think I agree with this, though I'm not sure exactly what your last sentence means. And yeah, of course comparing me to an enslaver because I called him a "walking fallacy" doesn't make a lot of sense.

    As a side note, remember how mad he got when someone called him a "chili molester"? How do you think he would have responded to being called an enslaver?

  19. #139
    I donít give a shit if heís banned or not, but he should never be allowed to message anyone on here again. It sounds like heís annoying as fuck. If I was a Cookout or another mod I would have told him to get fucked years ago.

    Needy ass adults are the worst of us.

  20. #140
    wow creamy tell us how you really feel man
    semi-aquatic like otters be.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •