JuiceCrewAllStar
Whole Milk Drinker
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2014
- Messages
- 37,038
- Reaction score
- 9,766
When you get rid of the villain's, you no longer have a movie.
this is so dumb
When you get rid of the villain's, you no longer have a movie.
I don't know what this weird phasing means either, but I'm pretty sure the modteam didn't ban him for "phoney monotonous woke bullshit."
When you get rid of the villain's, you no longer have a movie.
Tell that to The Martian
Look, if you want to brawl, here's how you do it. Set up a new sub-forum here. Call it The Octagon. Limit RJ to that board. Re-admit anyone previously banned for fighting or assholism (racism, sexism, etc. still needs a perma-ban) to that forum only. Deny all others the ability to post in that forum.
Then each week admit 5 regular member volunteers in there to see how they do. End of the week, poll the entire membership to see which one of the 5 held up the best. He/she stays as a permanent member of The Octagon. Someone should write a theme song.
After a couple of months you'll have the regular boards, and the most interesting place on the internet.
Everybody wins.
Just call it the thunderdome and use we don't need another hero by Tina TurnerLook, if you want to brawl, here's how you do it. Set up a new sub-forum here. Call it The Octagon. Limit RJ to that board. Re-admit anyone previously banned for fighting or assholism (racism, sexism, etc. still needs a perma-ban) to that forum only. Deny all others the ability to post in that forum.
Then each week admit 5 regular member volunteers in there to see how they do. End of the week, poll the entire membership to see which one of the 5 held up the best. He/she stays as a permanent member of The Octagon. Someone should write a theme song.
After a couple of months you'll have the regular boards, and the most interesting place on the internet.
Everybody wins.
I think some of it is generational too. I was personally raised as kind of a free range kid. So I have frequently gotten into it with people on these here message boards. But also understand that it's kind of the rules of the jungle so I really don't expect somebody to be banned or disciplined for giving it back to me.
That was a massive influx of people from another message board. And posting somebody's face on a photo shop or making derogatory comments about people in a picture with them is not argumentative that's just harassment. I would totally support banning people for that. That's arguably actionable behaviour there.This doesn't really track when there was some photoshopping involved.
Curious to hear a little more about the IRL Facebook stuff.
For the record, Biff hacking RJs boards account is 10× worse than anything RJ has ever done, I guess until publicly shit talking Cookout. That's a true violation of privacy and the ultimate act of disrespect.
Yeah thats hackingthis is such a deeply stupid take, even before taking into consideration that it was diggler who "hacked" RJ's account (he didn't hack shit, he guessed a password on like the first try)
there is no shortage of argumentative motherfuckers around here with terrible views
Yep.
Probably a majority of us can be fairly so described at various point(s) of our posting history.
I don't think anything RJ did here warrants a perma band. Just my opinion, not really attempting to protest or disparage the moderators, whose duties I would never desire to own. I'm guessing the decision was more a result of cumulative RJ complaint fatigue...which is a reflection on RJ as well as them whut couldn't resist complaining about (or arguing with) him.
Generally, I favor the idea of really limiting permanent bans. Shit, I've never even placed anyone on ignore. Sure, I can imagine some things crossing necessary lines of decorum and warranting moderating, temporary bans, and in very rare (hopefully) instances a permanent ban. Those lines are maybe sometimes simple to discern and apply and other times probably pretty challenging to fairly adjudicate.
Anyhow, for me it would have to be possibly the concerns about taking stuff from here into real life, depending on what transpired. Just being an annoying thin-skinned moralist (characteristics of more than one of us in this here little community) probably shouldn't get anyone banned.
Correct. I'd hate to see how posters who use the ignore function handle disagreements in the real world.