Strickland33
Well-known member
I did nothing of the sort. Learn to read.
Oh you were referring to another one of Joseph Goebbels's accomplishments?
I did nothing of the sort. Learn to read.
At the risk of repeating myself over and over, I do not agree that it is racist to notice a trend and express angst and dismay at that phenomena. In my opinion, if a professor notices a trend of black students doing worse than white students and ignores it, they would be implying that it is to be expected or normal. In other words, not discussing this would be worse.
As to the investigation, why can't Georgetown simply compare grades given in this class to other similarly-graded courses? I'm sure that we would all want to know that information before calling for their careers to be ended.
At the risk of repeating myself over and over, I do not agree that it is racist to notice a trend and express angst and dismay at that phenomena. In my opinion, if a professor notices a trend of black students doing worse than white students and ignores it, they would be implying that it is to be expected or normal. In other words, not discussing this would be worse.
As to the investigation, why can't Georgetown simply compare grades given in this class to other similarly-graded courses? I'm sure that we would all want to know that information before calling for their careers to be ended.
No need to shift to misogyny. How many buildings on campus are named after women?
We do have one called Kitchin
You don't know whether it was subjective, or the extent to which grades were subjective. I think you're making an assumption because it's the only way this can fit your narrative. The transcript indicates that the professors were tracking "did they open their mouths." That is objective. We've discussed sterotype threat, which would fit that scenario as a reasonable explanation.
You don't know whether it was subjective, or the extent to which grades were subjective. I think you're making an assumption because it's the only way this can fit your narrative. The transcript indicates that the professors were tracking "did they open their mouths." That is objective. We've discussed sterotype threat, which would fit that scenario as a reasonable explanation.
Who needs pesky things like facts to get in the way when there is a social justice narrative to promote?
the prof. was literally counting the times law students 'opened their mouths' and using that for grading purposes? for law school?
No need to shift to misogyny. How many buildings on campus are named after women?
They give the grades. They did not notice a trend. They caused the trend. And they said this while grading a Black student so you can’t say they observed this independent of the grading process.
Every law school exam I ever took was graded blind.