• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

Banning Critical Race Theory

It's a social construct if society believes those traits matter or serve functions that they don't therefore they're used as a sorting mechanism.
 
birdman said:
As I recall, current theories suggest that there has been run away sexual selection on both male genital size and female breast size in Homo sapiens. Male penises are way bigger than necessary to effectively impregnate females, and while bipedalism would entail some size and shape changes in sexual organs, human male genitals are 2-4 times bigger than our closest ape relatives (Chimpanzees, Bonobos, Gorillas). Run away sexual selection happens when a trait is selected for by the opposite sex, not because of some advantage the trait offers the individual to survive in the environment but because they just like it, or the trait sends some sort of signal about the quality of the individual with the trait, but the actual signal becomes disconnected from the advantage/quality. Peacock tails are a classic example of run away sexual selection, initially they might have signaled that a male was so adept at escaping predators that he could afford the burden of an extra-large tail, but they've become so big that they create a disadvantage for the males yet they still grow them because the females just love them. It is quite a common phenomenon in the natural world (especially in birds). So, it is quite possible and even probable that as humans evolved bipedalism, their cocks penises became more noticeable to females, and females, for some reason, chose to mate more often with males with larger cocks penises. There must be some simultaneous downward size selection though (e.g., vagina size), because we don't all have 4 foot dicks. I would argue that sexual selection is a form of a "social construct" because it creates selective advantages for specific traits that have little or nothing to do with biology/ecology, and mostly to do with visual/auditory/some other sensory preference

[I'm really looking forward to all the Tapa ads I am going to get from this post]
Click to expand...


Yeah, but what about middle finger size?
 
WakeandBake said:
Yep.

Some people prefer to be lied to. It’s a trip, man
Click to expand...

Yes... yes, they do.

Especially members of the party of truth and facts which fell hook line and sinker for the Steele Dossier along with the Kyle Rittenhouse was a white nationalist domestic terrorist narrative.

But it's a good thing CRT isn't being taught in schools!!!

 
Nothing to see here - Just another fake conservative "boogeyman"

 
WakeForestRanger said:
Click to expand...

Two books about Ruby Bridges including one by Ruby Bridges. Of course, the "Moms of Liberty" types didn't have a problem with Ruby Bridges experiencing racism firsthand.
 
Milhouse said:
oh the horror.

just what are you afraid of brad?
Click to expand...


crt+bogeyman.jpg
 
As usual, Rufo focuses on those things that seem to prove his point, but conveniently leaves out other parts that don't support it, or he emphasizes CRT out of context. Note the part that he says includes "Critical Race Theory", but he leaves out that CRT is only a part of a proposed curriculum that also includes "American History, African History, American Enslavement, Black/African American-led social movement, Black/African American social autonomy and economic development, Black/African American innovation, and Black/African American leadership nationally and globally." God forbid that kids in an urban, diverse school system learn about African History and black economic development and innovation!

And that last sentence doesn't say anything about CRT, it simply states that the school district is working to implement "a liberatory curriculum for Grades K-5 that embeds Black Studies across all subjects." Imagine the horror of having kids learn about Black Studies in school - no wonder guys like Rufo and Angus are so frightened. And in the meantime, we've got a "Moms for Liberty" parent group that wants to take books about MLK's March on Washington and Ruby Bridges out of school. Rubes (and bigots) indeed.
 
Last edited:
WFFaithful said:
Does Angus realize how easily he was manipulated?
Click to expand...

It's really the JH's and Junebugs who were arguably manipulated They're the ones who pretend to take the high road sometimes and think they're intelligent, but damn are they easily manipulated (or more likely they don't give a shit either way because they're big racists).
 
Shooshmoo said:
It's really the JH's and Junebugs who were arguably manipulated They're the ones who pretend to take the high road sometimes and think they're intelligent, but damn are they easily manipulated (or more likely they don't give a shit either way because they're big racists).
Click to expand...

Can’t be racist if they’re defending model minority Asian-Americans against affirmative action. Checkmate liberals!
 
Milhouse said:
oh the horror.

just what are you afraid of brad?
Click to expand...

Lulz - It's heartwarming to see the Tunnels finally move to the acceptance stage from "CRT doesn't even exist... IT"S A CONSERVATIVE BOOGEYMAN" to:

"It does exist but it's not taught in K-12" to

"It's only taught in a few K-12 schools" to

"So what if it's taught in K-12... what's the problem??"
 
Highland Deac said:
As usual, Rufo focuses on those things that seem to prove his point, but conveniently leaves out other parts that don't support it, or he emphasizes CRT out of context. Note the part that he says includes "Critical Race Theory", but he leaves out that CRT is only a part of a proposed curriculum that also includes "American History, African History, American Enslavement, Black/African American-led social movement, Black/African American social autonomy and economic development, Black/African American innovation, and Black/African American leadership nationally and globally." God forbid that kids in an urban, diverse school system learn about African History and black economic development and innovation!

And that last sentence doesn't say anything about CRT, it simply states that the school district is working to implement "a liberatory curriculum for Grades K-5 that embeds Black Studies across all subjects." Imagine the horror of having kids learn about Black Studies in school - no wonder guys like Rufo and Angus are so frightened. And in the meantime, we've got a "Moms for Liberty" parent group that wants to take books about MLK's March on Washington and Ruby Bridges out of school. Rubes (and bigots) indeed.
Click to expand...

What?? The tweet posted above clearly states "Critical Race Theory" is a component of the Black Studies curriculum.

Nobody is arguing that students shouldn't be learning about other components listed including African history, American Enslavement, etc.

This is a transparent and laughable attempt by the left to claim anyone against teaching CRT to K-12 students is also against teaching the important historical items listed above simply because they can't justify CRT as a stand alone on its own merits.

It's the same bullshit as stating anyone who dares to criticize Antifa looting and burning down buildings must be a fascist by default.
 
Last edited:
Colonel Angus said:
Lulz - It's heartwarming to see the Tunnels finally move to the acceptance stage from "CRT doesn't even exist... IT"S A CONSERVATIVE BOOGEYMAN" to:

"It does exist but it's not taught in K-12" to

"It's only taught in a few K-12 schools" to

"So what if it's taught in K-12... what's the problem??"
Click to expand...

The people who stripped the value out of higher education with their narrow-minded focus on advancing their political narratives in the name of education are curious why people don't want them to also mess up primary education the same way. But they also want the student loans forgiven because the degrees that people borrowed money to get aren't actually worth what the borrowers paid for.

They're always the last to know.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top