Page 4 of 67 FirstFirst 1234567891454 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 80 of 1329

Thread: 2022 Carolina Panthers Thread - Ickey named starting LT

  1. #61

  2. #62
    PM a mod to cement your internet status forever
    PhDeac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    134,211
    What trade value does Robby Anderson have? Maybe Anderson + Panthers' 5th (#148) for the Pats' 3rd (#85) and 4th (#125)?

  3. #63
    Quote Originally Posted by PhDeac View Post
    What trade value does Robby Anderson have? Maybe Anderson + Panthers' 5th (#148) for the Pats' 3rd (#85) and 4th (#125)?
    He has decent trade value and is probably praying for a trade right now - I think a bit better than what you have there. I had been eyeing NE as a possible trade back for my Ravens because they have to be in the WR market, and I expect a run on WRs between 9 and 16.

  4. #64
    Panthers restructuring contracts for cap room
    https://www.yahoo.com/news/panthers-...180127140.html

  5. #65

  6. #66
    Message Board Genius
    BiffTannen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Hill Valley
    Posts
    48,523
    Rock Hill and SC not living up to their end of the bargain.

  7. #67
    that's what happens when you try and ditch NC for the lesser one

  8. #68
    Calvin riddley suspended for the season next year. Will the NFC south be the worst division in football history?

  9. #69
    Quote Originally Posted by WFcatamount22 View Post
    Calvin riddley suspended for the season next year. Will the NFC south be the worst division in football history?
    Depends who is playing QB for NO and TB. TB will have some FAs to replace, but both teams have solid rosters. I wouldn't be surprised if Jameis runs it back with NO on another 1 year cheap deal. They weren't awful with him at QB, and Thomas will be healthy this year.

  10. #70
    https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/...tian-mccaffrey

    Panthers reportedly considering trade offers for CMC

  11. #71
    Trading CMC is a scary thought. He's the difference for us in a bad QB playing bad vs a bad QB playing well.

  12. #72
    RW3 to the Broncos

  13. #73
    Quote Originally Posted by guitardeac View Post
    Trading CMC is a scary thought. He's the difference for us in a bad QB playing bad vs a bad QB playing well.
    meh - i'm fine moving him for draft assets

    we are going to stink this year no matter what we do

  14. #74
    PM a mod to cement your internet status forever
    PhDeac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    134,211
    Quote Originally Posted by guitardeac View Post
    Trading CMC is a scary thought. He's the difference for us in a bad QB playing bad vs a bad QB playing well.
    Sure. But you know heís not going to play X number of games. So why not get something for him?

    Iím fine either way. I think this year is a wash regardless. This should be an inventory year with a new coach. Donít make major moves except maybe a prove it deal with Trubisky. Draft for need especially OL. See who is worth a long term investment on defense.

    Instead this franchise wants to win now while trying to trade for trade capital.

  15. #75
    Message Board Genius
    BiffTannen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Hill Valley
    Posts
    48,523
    Jags franchise tagged LT Cam Robinson yesterday. Probably means that they won't draft on OT with the #1 pick, pushing the top OL guys one pick closer to us (so we can draft a safety or something).

  16. #76
    We're not going to have our draft pick by the time the draft rolls around

  17. #77
    Quote Originally Posted by buckets View Post
    meh - i'm fine moving him for draft assets

    we are going to stink this year no matter what we do
    My concern is teams try to lowball given CMC/s contract and injury history. Keep him if you don't get offered real value. Like what the Broncos sent to Seattle for RW...

  18. #78
    PM a mod to cement your internet status forever
    PhDeac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    134,211
    Nobody is giving that up for a RB. We'd be lucky to get a 1st, 3rd, and a Day 3 pick.

    He's worth the most healthy, the least injured, and his trade value is probably closer to his injured value.

  19. #79
    Quote Originally Posted by PhDeac View Post
    Nobody is giving that up for a RB. We'd be lucky to get a 1st, 3rd, and a Day 3 pick.

    He's worth the most healthy, the least injured, and his trade value is probably closer to his injured value.
    Yeah, I realized after posting that sounded like I was expecting the same value. No way for a RB who is oft-injured.

  20. #80
    PM a mod to cement your internet status forever
    PhDeac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    134,211
    I'm seeing that the plan for the offense is to go to a run heavy offense. I guess that makes sense if the plan is not to rely on the QB, but it doesn't make sense in terms of how best to use CMC and keep him healthy.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •