TuffaloDeac10
🌹☭
Definitely ridiculous. Definitely unrelated to Suarez.
Definitely ridiculous. Definitely unrelated to Suarez.
BBCSport BBC Sport
FA chairman David Bernstein contacts all other board members to seek their views on whether John Terry should remain England captain
Hopefully they strip him of the armband. I don't see anyway that he can be captain of England with this over his head.
You honestly think the FA has a major say in the court system and how it proceeds with trials and judgment?
And then you propose some bizarre FA led conspiracy to have John Terry brought forward of criminal charges! Thanks for the laugh.
:rofl: You're even crazier than I fucking imagined. Jesus Christ. Get a grip of reality, you fucking lunatic.
And the FA hasn't prevented journos from talking about the Terry case. THE LAW has, you ignorant buffoon.
So who brought the police into it then? Quite interesting that it's never been said who.
The "criminal charges" will probably end up being weaker than the penalty the FA handed out to Suarez, both in terms of fine and period of being deprived of being able to do his job.
I don't know if you think cursing at me is clever or what. What I do know is you're damn lucky I don't live in South Carolina anymore. It would be worth a few hours drive to beat the shit out of you. It's not worth a few days drive. But someday. Don't think I don't know where to look.
You want to see lunatic. You'll see it, right then and there. It'll be worth a night in jail to watch blood come out of your mouth.
England's press doesn't have a right to ask questions? Pretty sure there's no law against that. There is however an FA that cuts off such questioning live in press conferences.
I don't see any citation of legality here. Just "we're not going to talk about that". You would think that if he had the excuse that it's illegal, he certainly would have used it. FA...running protection, with a miked up rep at the table, ensuring Terry doesn't respond to the press's questions. He even stopped Terry from answering!
BS. Accusations don't mean shit. John Terry was found out almost immediately by video. There has not yet been video come out to suggest Suarez did anything now more than a week later.
They need to be fined if they say another word about it. Let the investigation happen unfettered by media pressure. They're clearly just trying to unsettle him and the investigation team.
Ridiculous, but typical.
Completely agree with Dalglish that it needs to be done quickly and whichever is the guilty party should be punished.
It should be done ASAP and Suarez is cleared, then Evra should be punished.
If Suarez is found to have done something wrong, then he should be punished.
Under no circumstance should there not be someone punished here. You can't just let people make accusations with no repercussions.
And the FA should put a gag on everyone about it. Don't care who asked what about what. This should not be allowed to be used as an unsettling tactic in any way.
Talk about what's happening on the pitch. Leave the investigators to do their job unfettered by media or manager pressure.
It's strange to me that Terry was all but convicted by video in a matter of hours, but a week has revealed nothing similar except the dv7 equivalent of the Zapruder film.
I had actually forgotten about this already. I figured if anything had come of it, DV would have had a dozen posts on it that I would have seen at work where I can't log in.
I don't know if you think cursing at me is clever or what. What I do know is you're damn lucky I don't live in South Carolina anymore. It would be worth a few hours drive to beat the shit out of you. It's not worth a few days drive. But someday. Don't think I don't know where to look.
You want to see lunatic. You'll see it, right then and there. It'll be worth a night in jail to watch blood come out of your mouth.
Talking about an ongoing criminal court case and speculating about it can be seen as Contempt of Court in the UK.
http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/a_to_c/contempt_of_court/
A member of the public lodged the complaint:
"The Metropolitan police had spent the previous week assessing a complaint that was emailed by a member of the public 24 hours after the game at Loftus Road."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2011/nov/01/police-john-terry-anton-ferdinand
The Metropolitan police said yesterday that they were "notified of an incident ... involving alleged racial abuse" after a complaint from a member of the public following Sunday's match between the west London clubs at Loftus Road.
"This is currently being assessed by officers," police said in a statement.
http://jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20111026/sports/sports91.html
And again with the e-threats! Like clockwork.
Talking about an ongoing criminal court case and speculating about it can be seen as Contempt of Court in the UK.
http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/a_to_c/contempt_of_court/
Member of the public...so that eliminates pretty much no one. Maybe it eliminates members of the House of Windsor.
And what you cite has no restriction on the media asking a question, which obviously they know because they tried to do it. Terry could decline to answer, but what is odd is that the FA is running interference for him, going so far as to actually stop him from answering a question he clearly started to answer.
Noticed you haven't had anything to say about the 3rd Man U fan getting busted for racism in the past 13 months.