WFFaithful
Well-known member
deac04 seems like you just want to make a scene without really caring about the law.
If you want to see how it changes the law, read the thread.
If you want to see how it changes the law, read the thread.
deac04 seems like you just want to make a scene without really caring about the law.
If you want to see how it changes the law, read the thread.
I read the comments. Those are just folks' opinions. The proposal is very short. The state would acknowledge marriage between one man and one woman.
deac04 seems like you just want to make a scene without really caring about the law.
If you want to see how it changes the law, read the thread.
By saying not to encourage keeper I don't care about the law? I am just saying there's no point in arguing with him because it never leads to anything rational, just a lot of hatred. I care about the law, but I won't be stupid about who I argue it with.
By saying not to encourage keeper I don't care about the law? I am just saying there's no point in arguing with him because it never leads to anything rational, just a lot of hatred. I care about the law, but I won't be stupid about who I argue it with.
NC House speaker acknowledges the amendment will probably be repealed. Good thing he's forcing people to spend time and money fighting it anyway.
http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2012/03/27/tillis-if-amendment-one-passes-it-will-be-repealed/
NC House speaker acknowledges the amendment will probably be repealed. Good thing he's forcing people to spend time and money fighting it anyway.
http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2012/03/27/tillis-if-amendment-one-passes-it-will-be-repealed/
What gets me is that the whole reason for the amendment (according to them) is "to make it harder to reverse in the future" but the house speaker states that it will be changed in the near future...what a joke and what a waste of time and money.
Keeper, please explain to me exactly how it is any of your business....or mine....who someone else marries.
Was this just conveniently overlooked?
Proposed laws of the land is everybody's business.
Nice way to utterly side-step the question. What business does the government have in legislating who people marry? Why is it any of your business whom someone else marries? That's the question.
So you are voting against this amendment?
So, you say it isn't your business....but you are voting to make it your business, by government fiat.
It isn't my business who someone marries as long as it is legal. Just like I don't care how fast you drive as long as it is legal. I don't care what you eat, drink or smoke as long as it is legal.
If you vote against this amendment, gay marriage will still be illegal.
Plus, you'll be protecting women against domestic violence.