DeacdeTejas
Well-known member
We'll never know. I contend you put just about any NFL qb into that offense and they're gonna look great.
Possibly.
Although their record without Tony or Dak starting says otherwise
We'll never know. I contend you put just about any NFL qb into that offense and they're gonna look great.
Rodgers is better than Prescott. And our D took too long to get their shit together last night. So frustrating.
Sports are stupid and I hate them.
Now imagine your quarterback's white.
Rodgers/Roethlisberger/Brady- Playoff wins 46, Superbowl wins 7. That's what im talking about when I say quarterback matters when you have it in comparison to Alex Smith, Brock Osweiler, Matt Moore, etc...
There is definitely a reason Brady, Rodgers, and Roethlisberger are all left.
But it is also foolish to say Das was to blame or they should have played Romo. Das had the third best QBR in the divisional round (ahead of Brady). The Cowboys D played like shit the entire first half, and the offensive staff should have fed Elliott earlier in the game when the Packers were playing a large amount of Nickel D.
I don't understand how he doesn't have someone on staff to manage the clock at this pointHas Andy Reid officially taken the "can't win in the playoffs" crown from Schottenheimer?
Now imagine you aren't a terrible human being.
The fuck are you even talking about?
ETA: Nevermind. I don't care. Stay sleazy, palma. Stay sleazy.
Anybody with any sports intuition knew the Cowboys weren't making a serious run this postseason. You could just tell.
They definitely shouldn't have played Romo, they never would have made the comeback with that choker in there. That said, Dak should get a lot of the blame. Do you think Brady or Roethlesburger or even Ryan spikes that ball or doesn't tell his WRs to stay in bounds? They all would know who was standing on the opposite sideline. Who watching that game didn't say "too much time left" when Bailey kicked the FG? Obviously a big part of that is being a rookie in that spot for the first time and perhaps he doesn't make that mistake again, but he is nonetheless the QB and deserves a good deal of the blame for fucking it up.
I choose to blame the staff there over rookie but your point is valid
Don't validate that sexist blowhard.
Sure. You clearly know me, slick.You are one angry dude.
Sure. You clearly know me, slick.
It was actually 6. And more around. Facts matter.5.75. What else is there to know?
I don't think that's quite fair. I'm admittedly probably biased but I thought the Packers Cowboys winner was headed to Super Bowl either way. I'm not terribly impressed with the Falcons (though maybe I should be) and I didn't think the Giants could beat the Boys a third time
Nope. Cowboys weren't going to the Super Bowl. You could just tell.
Next year will be completely different for the Cowboys as they will have all of the pressure/scrutiny on them to win heading into the season before basically the entire OLine hits free agency, whereas this year nobody expected much of anything from them. As usual, Garrett will collapse under the pressure in glorious fashion. What is the over/under on Cowboys wins next year - 5.75?