The Stig
Member
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2011
- Messages
- 1,332
- Reaction score
- 19
Sure, but I would rather spend $3m on a basketball coach and expect 25+ wins and $1m on a football coach and expect 4-5 wins then spend $3m on a football coach and expect 6-7 wins and $1m on a basketball coach and expect 18-20 wins.
I am of the opinion that Grobe's compensation limited our coaching search last April.
In other words, recognizing that we have a limited amount of funds, I think we should prioritize basketball.
Considering that most athletic departments are driven by their football programs and that not one of us complained about Grobe's salary when it was announced in '07, I wouldn't hold my breath were I you. Considering he's only had 4 or less wins 3 times in 11 years (historically remarkable here) and we seem to be getting higher rated athletes he should get paid a decent amount. Would you complain about it if we get to the point were 6 wins is a bad year for us?
Limited funds is something which most schools face (yes we do have a steeper hill) so that shouldn't be used as a crutch. Why not just get rid of all "unnecessary" sports to prioritize one of the main ones?
Grobe makes a helluva lot more than most of us but should he be blamed for that? Would any of you jump at a chance to sign a contract like that coming off your best job performance ever? That said, he should be held accountable and prove that he's worth that money.