RChildress107
Well-known member
I voted a 2. I don't remember why I didn't give a 1 because I hated the hire. Maybe it was because I incorrectly thought that anyone was better than Bz and that warranted at 2.
Nah you had it about right.
I voted a 2. I don't remember why I didn't give a 1 because I hated the hire. Maybe it was because I incorrectly thought that anyone was better than Bz and that warranted at 2.
I voted a 1, which was and will always be the correct number.
Yep. I'm embarrassed I voted higher than 1.
If only we'd offered Shaka's wife tenure!
Heck, I voted 4. Thought it was a risky hire, but with a lot of upside potential, which if Danny was actually a good coach and having success, I think a lot of good players would've wanted to play for him. However, he's been a total dud.
You weren’t wrong. Whether that deserved a 4 or not is a different question.
I heard from a very unreliable source that Wellman botched the hire.
The "upside potential" was highly over-inflated...people mistook being glad [Redacted] was gone for "potential" from Manning. He was always an inexperienced, boring, old guy with very little upside and no plan.
The "upside potential" was highly over-inflated...people mistook being glad [Redacted] was gone for "potential" from Manning. He was always an inexperienced, boring, old guy with very little upside and no plan.
Shit hire.