ONW
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2011
- Messages
- 19,177
- Reaction score
- 658
Thomas is qualified to sit on the bench, I just don't agree with anything he says.
He really doesn't say anything.
Thomas is qualified to sit on the bench, I just don't agree with anything he says.
Thomas is qualified to sit on the bench, I just don't agree with anything he says.
Thomas was admitted and graduated from college and law school before the first Supreme Court ruling on affirmative action. That being said, wouldn't be the last time he failed to grasp the nuances in court rulings. Was utterly ridiculous when Pat Buchanan disparaged Sotomayor by saying that "Sarah Palin didn't need affirmative action", without noting neither did any of the tens of thousands who attended the same schools that Palin did. The recent UT ruling was also kind of silly. The woman who was rejected by UT graduated from LSU, not Rice. In the hundreds of colleges and universities in America, only a few dozen public schools have competitive admissions. It's not like people are being denied educations by going to LSU rather than UT. Affordable housing for teachers, cops, and firemen in affluent towns makes sense, but affordable housing doesn't need to be 10,000 square foot mansions.
This thread transitioned very quickly from a funny lighthearted jab at JH to revealing a very ugly side to RJ. Basically you can't be black and conservative or you are an Uncle Tom.
This thread transitioned very quickly from a funny lighthearted jab at JH to revealing a very ugly side to RJ. Basically you can't be black and conservative or you are an Uncle Tom.
This is a TOTAL lie. You owe me an apology.
THIS man isn't qualified. THIS man is a hypocrite. THIS man doesn't understand the basic ethics of being a judge. THIS man showed it by not recusing himself when the majority of his family income was earned taking a position lobbying for that case.
Maybe you just can't understand how ONE person doesn't equal EVERYONE. You should really work on it before posting total BULLSHIT.
I disagree dramatically with many of the positions you take based on your faith. But I don't extrapolate this to meaning you have an "ugly side". You should do the same.
There is NO excuse for your post other than total ignorance, laziness and desire to insult the core of someone.
This is a TOTAL lie. You owe me an apology.
It's not a lie. it's a spot on description. You throwing out the Uncle Tom label is disgusting, but not surprising given your history of hypocrisy on these boards.
WRONG AGAIN!
Can you not READ? I said "Thomas" not Tom. There is a HUGE difference.
Uncle Tom Sowell can be thrown in for effect.
RJ has many ugly sides...like the many aspects of a gemstone, except his gives off a shitty-glint that seems to cloud every chat room. He reminds me of the character from Old Brother Where Art Thou...the guy startles awake and grumble-shouts "GD my hair!" I can see ol' RJ, like Sisyphus, duly rolling the rock of all human ills up the hill and back again... "GD the ills!"
*Actually, Thomas Sowell is an exceptionally bright and gifted man as was his mentor Milton Friedman
It's not a lie. it's a spot on description. You throwing out the Uncle Tom label is disgusting, but not surprising given your history of hypocrisy on these boards.
facets?
Not just these boards
facets?