PhDeac
PM a mod to cement your internet status forever
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2011
- Messages
- 155,824
- Reaction score
- 22,793
I cut it off at the 45-minute mark because a lot of them were just repeating the same thing. They were different athletes in different sports, but when they're all saying the same thing over and over, it becomes tedious. It felt like it was being dragged out. 5 guys saying "I trusted the wrong person" or "I really wanted to keep up with the Joneses" is just as effective as 15 guys saying it. Okay, I get it. Athletes like nice stuff. To me, it just ran its points into the ground with too much repetition. The pace of the story wasn't consistent. That's just my opinion though...I'm sure I'm in the minority.
Edited to add that I think a one-hour documentary on one particular athlete going broke (like a Kosar or a Rison) would've been MUCH more effective, with little statistical overlays about athletes in general thrown in every now and then.
Interesting. My take was completely different. I thought the pace was very good. It was a good mix of stories from athletes, stories about athletes who weren't interviewed, and others in the business with contact with athletes. I think a one hour story about Kosar or Rison would have been more repetitious and you basically got their stories anyway.