• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

State of the Buzz - End of Year Three (Regular Season)

Three years later, where do you stand on our dear Buzz?


  • Total voters
    354
I think you and the 98%ers have most of your anger misplaced.

Replacing Bz isn't going to fix our problem.

Not sure what this means. The 98%ers want to get rid of Bz and Wellman. Who else needs to go to fix our problem?
 
Forgive the unforgivable? LOL......wow, so now the reason that one would expect from a school like Wake is tossed out and religious zealotry is in control? Does this go something like....

First shalt thou hire a coach. Then, shalt thou count to three years, no more, no less. Three years shalt be the number thou shalt count, and the number of the counting shall be three. Four years shalt thou not count unless NCAA bound earlier, nor either count thou two years, excepting that thou then proceed to three years. Five years is right out unless NCAA bound twice. Once the number three, being the third year, be reached, then sack the coach if not NCAA bound. Thus sayeth the Lord.

I'm not religiously stuck to some sort of schedule like you are.....and I don't have visions of a Wake ideal "promised land" without Bz like you do. Same guy is in charge.

I've stated many times Dino should have gotten another year with players that he recruited, and not be evaluated coaching players as the big brother while they were missing their father-like Skip. I've stated many times and in this very thread that it was a complete mistake to hire Bz because he didn't fit the players or recruits. BOTH are what should be unforgivable...and neither is Bz. I think Bz should get another year with HIS players regardless of what happened in years 1 and 2 (and sanctioned by Wake). I think you and the 98%ers have most of your anger misplaced.

Replacing Bz isn't going to fix our problem.

Nice Monty Python quote.
 
Pretty impressed you remember that was me. The "grid" of Kevin Swinton's binary games in 2006/2007 (seriously, this will never be duplicated):

0-0.0000-0.0000-0.0000000100
0-1.0000-0.0000-0.0001000000
0-1.0000-0.0000-0.0001001100
0-0.0000-0.0000-0.0000000000
0-1.0000-0.0000-0.0000000010
0-1.0000-0.0000-0.0001000110
0-0.0000-0.0000-0.0001000110
0-1.0000-0.0000-0.0000000110
0-0.0000-0.0000-0.0001000000
0-0.0000-0.0000-0.0000000000
0-1.0000-0.0000-1.0000000010

What's really scary is how many almost binary games he had I couldn't include where he either made 1 bucket for 2 points or he got 2 rebounds - with every other stat being a 1 or 0.

That's even better than I remembered. What a perfect nickname.
 
It's not scientific but neither is the AD media spin.
 
Well, I, for one, am shocked to see NeuroDeac weigh in on the BzzIn side of the fence. You'd think after we finished with 13 wins this year, following his preseason prediction of 19, that maybe the needle would shift a little bit. Same thing with Schwabber, still vehemently defending Bzz and his 6 conference wins after he "guaranteed" 8 conference wins last spring, "no excuses." Just goes to show that BzzInners have no standards, no accountability, and no brains. That's the only way you could defend the clown at this point.
 
I predicted 15 wins and I had no faith in [Redacted]. He couldn't even reach my paltry level of expectation. Holy shit.
 
Back
Top