ArlingtonDeac
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2011
- Messages
- 4,861
- Reaction score
- 413
It's a strong enough assumption to defeat the argument that failure to have HC does not affect interstate commerce sufficiently to support the commerce power.
I didn't say under the commerce clause. I said mandates have been legally used before by Congress, and that the commerce clause allows the use of any legislative methods necessary to assure a regulatory scheme has effect.
We can agree to wholly disagree on the last part. Suing is the last gasp of losing.
I didn't say under the commerce clause. I said mandates have been legally used before by Congress, and that the commerce clause allows the use of any legislative methods necessary to assure a regulatory scheme has effect.
We can agree to wholly disagree on the last part. Suing is the last gasp of losing.