• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

John Lewis on the new voting laws

RJKarl

Banhammer'd
Joined
Mar 17, 2011
Messages
78,116
Reaction score
3,112
Location
HB, CA
Here's what he said today:


"The Democratic National Convention released a full transcript of Rep. John Lewis's (D-Ga.) speech to the 2012 Democratic National Convention (as prepared for delivery). Read the full text below:

I first came to this city in 1961, the year Barack Obama was born. I was one of the 13 original "Freedom Riders." We were on a bus ride from Washington to New Orleans trying to test a recent Supreme Court ruling that banned racial discrimination on buses crossing state lines and in the stations that served them. Here in Charlotte, a young African-American rider got off the bus and tried to get a shoe shine in a so-called white waiting room. He was arrested and taken to jail.

On that same day, we continued on to Rock Hill, South Carolina, about 25 miles. From here, when my seatmate, Albert Bigelow, and I tried to enter a white waiting room, we were met by an angry mob that beat us and left us lying in a pool of blood. Some police officers came up and asked us whether we wanted to press charges. We said, "No, we come in peace, love and nonviolence." We said our struggle was not against individuals, but against unjust laws and customs. Our goal was true freedom for every American.

Since then, America has made a lot of progress. We are a different society than we were in 1961. And in 2008, we showed the world the true promise of America when we elected President Barack Obama. A few years ago, a man from Rock Hill, inspired by President Obama's election, decided to come forward. He came to my office in Washington and said, "I am one of the people who beat you. I want to apologize. Will you forgive me?" I said, "I accept your apology." He started crying. He gave me a hug. I hugged him back, and we both started crying. This man and I don't want to go back; we want to move forward.

Brothers and sisters, do you want to go back? Or do you want to keep America moving forward? My dear friends, your vote is precious, almost sacred. It is the most powerful, nonviolent tool we have to create a more perfect union. Not too long ago, people stood in unmovable lines. They had to pass a so-called literacy test, pay a poll tax. On one occasion, a man was asked to count the number of bubbles in a bar of soap. On another occasion, one was asked to count the jelly beans in a jar—all to keep them from casting their ballots.

Today it is unbelievable that there are Republican officials still trying to stop some people from voting. They are changing the rules, cutting polling hours and imposing requirements intended to suppress the vote. The Republican leader in the Pennsylvania House even bragged that his state's new voter ID law is "gonna allow Governor Romney to win the state." That's not right. That's not fair. That's not just.

And similar efforts have been made in Texas, Ohio, Florida, Wisconsin, Arizona, Georgia and South Carolina. I've seen this before. I've lived this before. Too many people struggled, suffered and died to make it possible for every American to exercise their right to vote.

And we have come too far together to ever turn back. So we must not be silent. We must stand up, speak up and speak out. We must march to the polls like never before. We must come together and exercise our sacred right. And together, on November 6, we will re-elect the man who will lead America forward: President Barack Obama."

Anyone who supports these laws to suppress the vote should be ashamed. They wear the blood of John Lewis and others on their souls.
 
The same laws don't affect working Republican voters in what way?
 
Those who support voter suppression laws are the Bull Connors and new CCC members.

It's a national disgrace and is inexcusable.
 
It's equally disgraceful to suppress Republicans.

But you can't really think the laws stop as many Republicans as dems or independents. We have the sworn testimony of multiple GOP elected officials and party officials.
 
The same laws don't affect working Republican voters in what way?

Perhaps they do, but that's not why they're made and we both know it. States with solid Republican constituencies don't have any need for voter suppression laws, even if voter fraud is just as probable...
 
It's equally disgraceful to suppress Republicans.

But you can't really think the laws stop as many Republicans as dems or independents. We have the sworn testimony of multiple GOP elected officials and party officials.

Why wouldn't it stop as many Republicans? Same hours, same restrictions... what qualities does the average Republican voter have that makes him or her more able to get to the polls? Most of the supression I've read about (and I don't have an immediate link, sorry) relates to absentee voting by the military. Now what would be something to cry over.
 
Why wouldn't it stop as many Republicans? Same hours, same restrictions... what qualities does the average Republican voter have that makes him or her more able to get to the polls? Most of the supression I've read about (and I don't have an immediate link, sorry) relates to absentee voting by the military. Now what would be something to cry over.

How many solid red states have proposed voter ID laws?
 
Why wouldn't it stop as many Republicans? Same hours, same restrictions... what qualities does the average Republican voter have that makes him or her more able to get to the polls? Most of the supression I've read about (and I don't have an immediate link, sorry) relates to absentee voting by the military. Now what would be something to cry over.

That wasn't the case in Ohio.
 
So Ohio proposed two laws? One for Republicans and one for the rest?

Yes they did. The Secretary of state voted WITH every Republican county and AGAINST EVERY Dem county. There were different hours of operations and number of days open.
 
Yes they did. The Secretary of state voted WITH every Republican county and AGAINST EVERY Dem county. There were different hours of operations and number of days open.

So, people in Ohio are segregated by political affiliation? I know what you're driving at but I'm not convinced there is a clear advantage for Republicans. And independents must be totally confused in the heartland. How do we solve this? I don't have a problem with 24/7 voting. But you only get to vote once and you have to be alive and not a cartoon character to do it.
 
Just get a photo ID and shut up. Problem solved.
 
In black/Dem counties cutting voting hours and voting days is a huge loss. Do some homework before spouting your extremist nonsense.

You used to be reasonable. Now you have gone over the edge.
 
These voter id laws are odious and unamerican. Pathetic.
 
Voting hours should be at least statewide, if not nationwide. Even I agree with that, and I'm all about requiring people to show ID to vote.
 
In black/Dem counties cutting voting hours and voting days is a huge loss. Do some homework before spouting your extremist nonsense.

You used to be reasonable. Now you have gone over the edge.

I still think this is all smoke and mirrors on your part because if I'm not mistaken in every election I've watched the polls stay open until everyone who shows up after work gets to vote. You get in line and no matter how slow it goes you get your vote. What do they do where you live? What do they do in Ohio? Chain the door at 5? I doubt it. I doubt it very much.
 
I just cannot understand the rationale of getting behind measures that will make it more difficult for people to exercise their right to vote. It is a completely foreign concept to me.
 
I just cannot understand the rationale of getting behind measures that will make it more difficult for people to exercise their right to vote. It is a completely foreign concept to me.

I agree. Military personel overseas should get to vote tomorrow.
 
Back
Top