• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

Good news for the women's bball team.

Being a regular NCAA participant is reasonable if Hoover can bring in top 50-100 talent on a regular basis.

The ceiling? Why can't we make a run to the final four?
 
All it takes to be elite in women's bball is some money. And, as in most non-revs with full scholarships, Wakes revenue sport structural disadvantages (academics, size, etc) are likely actually advantages. And there are only two blue bloods out there.
 
WFU Lurker said:
All it takes to be elite in women's bball is some money. And, as in most non-revs with full scholarships, Wakes revenue sport structural disadvantages (academics, size, etc) are likely actually advantages. And there are only two blue bloods out there.
Click to expand...

Who do you consider the blue bloods? Obviously UCONN. who else?
 
Wakeforest22890 said:
Right now: UConn, Tennessee, Notre Dame, Stanford, Duke, UNC - maybe even Maryland.
Click to expand...

The rest aren't on the same level historically as UConn and Tennessee.

The formula for Wake women's hoops is pretty simple. Get a good coach. Do more with fewer resources. Get more resources. Do more with more resources. Jam the Joel. Make the NCAAT. Win championships.
 
PhDeac said:
The rest aren't on the same level historically as UConn and Tennessee.

The formula for Wake women's hoops is pretty simple. Get a good coach. Do more with fewer resources. Get more resources. Do more with more resources. Jam the Joel. Make the NCAAT. Win championships.
Click to expand...

Oh true. I was thinking of teams who have historically gotten great recruits and been dominant. Obviously that list pretty much begins and ends with Uconn and Tennesee if we're looking at consistency for a long period of time.
 
Wakeforest22890 said:
Oh true. I was thinking of teams who have historically gotten great recruits and been dominant. Obviously that list pretty much begins and ends with Uconn and Tennesee if we're looking at consistency for a long period of time.
Click to expand...

It's a fine list, no question, but even on that list you've got to separate out UConn and Tennessee. The other schools are closer to La Tech in the 90s than UConn and Tennessee now.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top