This post again just serves to underscore that you do not understand structural racism. I'm not having this discussion again. You can continue on your merry way
While this must be a tempting and convenient way to cast one's political opponents, you might consider that anything worth having is worth building correctly. Blaming self-destructive choices on "structural racism" might feel really good, but it doesn't solve anything (nor can the anxiety/guilt it is designed to engender be leveraged to solve anything, either). There aren't many shortcuts on the road to sustainable prosperity. The growth in impoverished communities has to be
owned by those communities (and I firmly believe that they can and will do it, with the right types of help, ironically enough, by rebuilding and empowering the structures (family, schools, and community organizations, including churches) within those communities
because those thinks actually work, rather than forcing it on them from "on high". Forcing it upon them with feel-good policies with little to no track record of success against must be irresistibly tempting, but it will not work. It has never worked. I marvel at the idea that there is a lab-engineered, cold-fusion in a liberal jar substitute for a functioning family unit. But remember, I'm "so dumb", so what do I know?
I do find the staunch resistance to discuss family structure (If you're looking for a foundational place to start, it is hard to imagine a factor more in the control of a given person, as compared to say evils of structural racism) telling. Are we trying to really solve this or not? Here you go:
http://www.theatlantic.com/business...makes-income-inequality-so-much-worse/280056/