• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

islam

In almost all the cases there have been ties to ISIS online whilst leading primarily "normal" lives in America.

Why are these individuals more susceptible to receiving and being enamored with these messages than any other member of society? Is their anger, frustration, and hopelessness solely the product of Islam? Do we even know if a majority of homegrown terrorists were even devout practitioners?
 
Immediate threats? You think those guys came out of the womb terrorists? They each had 20+ years to assimilate

Right, and there aren't a whole lot of them who have been successful. So presumably the more time passes from their connection, the even lower the possibility becomes. Move to the next generation and hopefully it goes even lower. The same way we have relatively few pro-slavery people running around any more.
 
Right, and there aren't a whole lot of them who have been successful. So presumably the more time passes from their connection, the even lower the possibility becomes. Move to the next generation and hopefully it goes even lower. The same way we have relatively few pro-slavery people running around any more.

There were 3.3 million Muslims living in the United States as of 2015
 
... there aren't a whole lot of them .
You're exactly right, there aren't a lot of Muslim terrorists in the US, and the few of them there are were born here. American toddlers kill more Americans with guns annually than Muslims terrorists kill Americans domestically.
 
Yet all of our liberal attempts to ban toddlers are met with staunch conservative resistance.
 
Where and when was this filmed?

This is from the original upload of the vid on YouTube, from May 19, 2013.
When Muslim organizations invite Shaykhs who speak openly about the values of Islam, the Islamophobic western media starts murdering the character of that organization and the invited speaker. The question these Islamophobic journalists need to reflect upon is; are these so called ''radical'' views that they criticize endorsed only by these few individuals being invited around the globe, or does the common Muslims believe in them. If the common Muslims believe in these values that means that more or less all Muslims are radical and that Islam is a radical religion. Since this is not the case, as Islam is a peaceful religion and so are the masses of common Muslims, these Shaykhs cannot be radical. Rather it is Islamophobia from the ignorant western media who is more concerned about making money by alienating Islam by presenting Muslims in this way. Islam Net, an organization in Norway, invited 9 speakers to Peace Conference Scandinavia 2013. These speakers would most likely be labelled as ''extremists'' if the media were to write about the conference. But how come this conference was the largest Islamic Scandinavian International event that has taken place in Norway with about 4000 people attending? Were the majority of those who attended in opposition to what the speakers were preaching? If so, how come they paid to enter? Let's forget about that for a moment, let's imagine that we don't really knew what all these people thought about for example segregation of men and women, or stoning to death of those who commit adultery. The Chairman of Islam Net, Fahad Ullah Qureshi asked the audience, and the answer was clear. The attendees were common Sunni Muslims. They did not consider themselves as radicals or extremists. They believed that segregation was the right thing to do, both men and women agreed upon this. They even supported stoning or whatever punishment Islam or prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) commanded for adultery or any other crime. They even believed that these practises should be implemented around the world. Now what does that tell us? Either all Muslims and Islam is radical, or the media is Islamophobic and racist in their presentation of Islam. Islam is not radical, nor is Muslims in general radical. That means that the media is the reason for the hatred against Muslims, which is spreading among the non-Muslims in western countries.
 
People might take you mores seriously if you sources other than the hatchet company that is Breitbart.
 
Trying to kill the messenger, that always solves the problem.

Try reading the rest of my posts; or have you now added slothful reading skills to slothful writing ones?
 
Back
Top