• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

DEMOCRATS SHOULD ASK CLINTON TO STEP ASIDE

deacvision7 said:
No, it is your racist comments about black people that make me think you are a racist.
Click to expand...

LOL. When black people fuck up they should be criticized just like anybody else who fucks up. That's part of that equal rights that you claim to support.

Go back to your PC safe space.
 
bobknightfan said:
LOL. When black people fuck up they should be criticized just like anybody else who fucks up. That's part of that equal rights that you claim to support.

Go back to your PC safe space.
Click to expand...

Did Bob Knight fuck up when he threw a chair? Grabbed a player by the throat? Threw a lamp at a woman?
 
ChrisL68 said:
He edited the Harvard Law Review and taught constitutional law for over a dozen years and was a State senator for 8 years and a US senator for 4. And he showed some interest and depth in understanding policy and issues and was able to talk about both competently. I know you have this grand desire to try to equate to Caribou Barbie or Trump, but it is just weak sauce.
Click to expand...

I find it amusing that so many are trying to argue that Obama's resume as outlined above, which so clearly lacks any tangible experience, is somehow superior to Trump's simply because Trump hasn't had "government service" experience. Gimme a fucking break. Obama is the biggest lightweight to head a major party candidacy in my lifetime, by far, but he talked a good talk and people liked him. He had ZERO real world experience outside of his brief time in the Senate, which was really just to hold water and bolster his candidacy (similar to Hillary's).

Trump, by contrast, has experience that is exclusively in the private business sector, which has its own drawbacks. But it is executive experience, and it is over the course of several decades. We can argue over his temperament, pussy grabbing, etc, but quit trying to make the stupid argument that Obama was somehow more qualified on paper from the outset to run a country.

And Jesus Christ, like you all care if a candidate is qualified. Romney was the most well-qualified non-incumbent candidate that any of you toads had the option of voting for and all we heard about was Bain Capital for months on end.
 
ChrisL68 said:
He edited the Harvard Law Review and taught constitutional law for over a dozen years and was a State senator for 8 years and a US senator for 4. And he showed some interest and depth in understanding policy and issues and was able to talk about both competently. I know you have this grand desire to try to equate to Caribou Barbie or Trump, but it is just weak sauce.
Click to expand...

You are proving my point. That is 20+ years of jack shit when talking qualifications to lead the world's supposed foremost superpower.
 
bobknightfan said:
LOL. When black people fuck up they should be criticized just like anybody else who fucks up. That's part of that equal rights that you claim to support.

Go back to your PC safe space.
Click to expand...

A single person does deserved to be criticized when they fuck up. But what you do is not that. What you do is take a single person's fuck up and attribute to anybody that happens to have that person's skin tone and claim that all those people fucked up.

Which is racist, you nitwit.
 
myDeaconmyhand said:
How exactly do you figure that Trumps career "resulted in exponentially more public service than Obama's". Do you consider opening and closing three casinos and being on the Apprentice to be public service?

Sent from my SM-N930T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I would say that however many millions Trump has donated to charity over the course of his career has resulted in exponentially more tangible public service results than Obama chasing his tail as a community organizer and halfass politician prior to his presidential nomination.
 
2&2 Slider To Leyritz said:
You are proving my point. That is 20+ years of jack shit when talking qualifications to lead the world's supposed foremost superpower.
Click to expand...

Being a US Senator is not a qualification for being President?

That's weird.

▾
NameYears as SenatorYears as President
Monroe, James1790-17941817-1825
Adams, John Quincy1803-18081825-1829
Jackson, Andrew1797-1798; 1823-18251829-1837
Van Buren, Martin1821-18281837-1841
Harrison, William Henry1825-18281841
Tyler, John1827-18361841-1845
Pierce, Franklin1837-18421853-1857
Buchanan, James1834-18451857-1861
Johnson, Andrew1857-1862; 18751865-1869
Harrison, Benjamin1881-18871889-1893
Harding, Warren G.1915-19211921-1923
Truman, Harry S.1935-19451945-1953
Kennedy, John F.1953-19601961-1963
Johnson, Lyndon B.1949-19611963-1969
Nixon, Richard M.1950-19531969-1974
Obama, Barack2005-20082009- present
 
sailordeac said:
Trump has accomplishments. Hillary has none.
Click to expand...

Yep. while other casinos were making hundreds of millions of dollars Trump was BKing his FOUR TIMES
It's an accomplishment to get fined $1,000,00 for using illegal foreign workers.
It's an accomplishment to steal from hundreds of contractors.
It's an accomplishment to assault as many women as he did.
It's an accomplishment to get a top adversary to steal emails for you.
 
Is it a qualification? Sure. But if you can con the country into thinking it should be your only qualification, then by all means keep peddling that snake oil.
 
if you compare what W did with the US economy to what trump did with the money he was given, i don't see how you can argue trump isn't presidential
 
EatLeadCommie said:
But it is executive experience, and it is over the course of several decades.
Click to expand...

If we're electing the people who have executive experience in the Trump Org, we should be electing his kids and this guy:

george-ross.jpg


Trump was too busy grabbin' puss, ogling Miss. Universe contestants, and firing people on tv to run anything.
 
Last edited:
Conservatives sure do have a hard-on for getting "business men" in the white house. No thanks. Please keep nominating them though.

Sent from my SM-N930T using Tapatalk
 
Knight said:
Never, in all my days, would I have ever thought I would see DV7 (or anyone else, for that matter), argue that Obama was an "experienced" candidate.

It was literally his biggest negative target point coming into office. Republicans hammered him on it every election cycle. Historians and analysts have consistently pointed to his inexperience being a major factor in the way the last 8 years of US foreign policy have shaken out.
Click to expand...

Where did I use the word you put in quotations about President Obama?
 
deacvision7 said:
Being a US Senator is not a qualification for being President?

That's weird.

▾
NameYears as SenatorYears as President
Monroe, James1790-17941817-1825
Adams, John Quincy1803-18081825-1829
Jackson, Andrew1797-1798; 1823-18251829-1837
Van Buren, Martin1821-18281837-1841
Harrison, William Henry1825-18281841
Tyler, John1827-18361841-1845
Pierce, Franklin1837-18421853-1857
Buchanan, James1834-18451857-1861
Johnson, Andrew1857-1862; 18751865-1869
Harrison, Benjamin1881-18871889-1893
Harding, Warren G.1915-19211921-1923
Truman, Harry S.1935-19451945-1953
Kennedy, John F.1953-19601961-1963
Johnson, Lyndon B.1949-19611963-1969
Nixon, Richard M.1950-19531969-1974
Obama, Barack2005-20082009- present
Click to expand...

This chart is classic. Of all on there pretty sure Obama is the only one or one of two where they ONLY had 3 years in senate. His tough votes in the time of "present" was equally impressive. GTFOH with the revisionist history.
 
2&2 Slider To Leyritz said:
Is it a qualification? Sure. But if you can con the country into thinking it should be your only qualification, then by all means keep peddling that snake oil.
Click to expand...

How about creating and getting a law passed that gives over 8,000,000 children health insurance that wouldn't have any?

How about getting public schools in several states to accept and teach children with disabilities?

How about negotiating a ceasefire in the West Bank?

How about fighting the GOP and getting healthcare Republicans didn't want to give to Ground Zero 1st Responders?

There's much more, but it wouldn't matter to you.
 
Deacs89 said:
This chart is classic. Of all on there pretty sure Obama is the only one or one of two where they ONLY had 3 years in senate. His tough votes in the time of "present" was equally impressive. GTFOH with the revisionist history.
Click to expand...

What the hell are you talking about?
 
deacvision7 said:
What the hell are you talking about?
Click to expand...

Well look at the chart. Nixon had 3 years on the senate. But that wasn't all he had in terms of experience amongst being in the Navy.

I just think its funny that you are touting Obama as now being experienced before entering the white house. what the fuck are you talking about ?
 
Deacs89 said:
Well look at the chart. Nixon had 3 years on the senate. But that wasn't all he had in terms of experience amongst being in the Navy.

I just think its funny that you are touting Obama as now being experienced before entering the white house. what the fuck are you talking about ?
Click to expand...

i think the chart was proffered as just as a list of presidents who were senators prior to being president.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top