Wakeforest22890
Snowpom
Most really big cities have more negatives than they do positives... NYC, LA, SF, CHI, PHI, DC
Yeah those cities surely are no Winston-Salem or even Randleman, NC amirite?!
Most really big cities have more negatives than they do positives... NYC, LA, SF, CHI, PHI, DC
Most really big cities have more negatives than they do positives... NYC, LA, SF, CHI, PHI, DC
We can joke on Illinois all we want. Chicago is pretty awesome city though. Weather sucks. But the city is fantastic.
Makes you wonder why hundreds of millions of people are trapped in big cities and their metro areas.
Is it possible, now hear me out on this, that some people may like big cities and some people may like rural areas?
Is it possible, now hear me out on this, that some people may like big cities and some people may like rural areas?
Is it possible, now hear me out on this, that some people may like big cities and some people may like rural areas?
IL was of no consequence before Ayo. Why not go back to that?
Who cares about them?
It is true big cities have a lot more things to do, but they also tend to be more expensive to do, and after you mature and get to the family raising stuff, you have plenty to do without worrying about nightlife. Point is younger people generally like big cites, while more mature citizens don't. It is more IMO a function of age and family status than education, politics, religion, etc,nothing wrong or unusual about either
last time we had a big thing with Illinois we got our ass handed to us.