Strickland33
Well-known member
Because I respect PHs political opinions far more than theirs.
and yet you're denigrating his opinions, perspectives, and experiences in your engagement. Why?
Because I respect PHs political opinions far more than theirs.
The unfairness of lifeMaybe. What do you think i'm bitter about?
Eh, just because i'm disputing his statements doesnt mean i'm denigrating them. He called me stupid for posting correlative racial voting data from a relevant newspaper research article. How should I respond to that?and yet you're denigrating his opinions, perspectives, and experiences in your engagement. Why?
Eh, just because i'm disputing his statements doesnt mean i'm denigrating them. He called me stupid for posting correlative racial voting data from a relevant newspaper research article. How should I respond to that?
Check out this bleeding heart liberal over here!The unfairness of life
It's not anything I've honestly put a lot of thought into.Check out this bleeding heart liberal over here!
Any way dude, I hope you have a deeper critique of my temperament than that, cause that's nothing.
Glad you said that, so I don't have to.It's not anything I've honestly put a lot of thought into.
Glad you said that, so I don't have to.
Eh, just because i'm disputing his statements doesnt mean i'm denigrating them. He called me stupid for posting correlative racial voting data from a relevant newspaper research article. How should I respond to that?
All you have to counter it are anecdotes. It seems really important to you that people believe Gillum split the suburban vote, rather than winning on the strength of the black vote.That was only one of several reasons I questioned your intelligence.
That article was pretty horrible analysis. Even worse, it was horrible analysis to push a BFK-like "monolithic black vote" narrative. I had already seen it the day it came out. It was a joke. I was disappointed that you posted it.
You're disputing every primary overview thats been written about Gillum, including the quotations from his own campaign. DeSantis won A LOT MORE areas than just "large metro areas" - he beat his opponent by 20%. The heaviest black populations in Florida made up the near totality of Gillums 34% win, of which he only won by 3%. It's very strange that you're discounting the importance of the black vote in Gillums victory, when his own campaign team explicitly stated they needed a large black turnout to win.I didn’t counter it with anecdotes. I countered it by explaining to you why it was bad analysis. Again, Gillum won large metro areas. So did DeSantis. The same article could probably be written about DeSantis too.
I can post a map of Hillsborough County (Tampa) showing that the city and northern and southern suburbs went for Gillum and the rural area to the east went for Graham. But then you’ll say I don’t know what suburban means.
I could post the PPP poll showing that Gillum has plus approval among every race, gender, age group but you’ll say it doesn’t include education.
I haven’t see the facts that would convince you you’re wrong. I do know the analysis you rely on is poor analysis.
Obviously, Gillum didn't win with only support from black people. [/B]
No, they're not. For one, they don't advocate for fascist political ideology. That's a pretty significant difference. This rhetoric is stupid, too.
I have gotten this sense. We're all molded by our relationship to class, occupation, etc. I think that you and Ph are probably a lot closer than you think that you are. Why focus on Ph when ChrisL and Shmoo have been and continue to say even less true generalizations about the "white working class" and the suburban white middle class?
Jesus Christ, who the hell said that ONLY black people voted for Gillum?? Shit man, I dont know where you're coming up with these nonsense responses, but I hope you get it figured out.
To make this easy, please re-quote where I said that "no white people voted for Gillum". Please.
edited - removed needless insults