The plotline that always made the most sense to me was (all speculation)...
1) Frustration with under performance in postseason
1a) potential personality or vision of program disagreements between Dino and Wellman
2) Wellman fires Dino coming off 3 seasons with a 67% win % with the stated expectation that Wake should win in the postseason
3) Coaching fraternity raises eyebrows and disapproves of move b/c of Dino's record was good and hadn't "failed," and had recently been extended
4) Wellman whiffs on top choice(s) - probably Stevens at least, maybe more
5) Hires Bz
6) overall reaction to hire is "WTF?" (especially noting that Bz showed no evidence of rectifying Wellman's criterion for Dino's dismissal - postseason success)
7) in response to 3 and 6, rumors begin to emerge or professional or personal impropriety
8) bz throws character of program and players under the bus as Wellman shifts the narrative from postseason success to program "Culture"
Seems correct and is an incredible indictment of the character of Ron Wellman.
I don't know how some of you guys can support the guy who destroyed Wake basketball just to satisfy his own hubris.