• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

Axios: The biggest political scandal in American history

Newenglanddeac

Well-known member
Joined
May 1, 2011
Messages
13,135
Reaction score
390
The biggest political scandal in American history
Jim VandeHei, Mike Allen

Even without seeing Robert Mueller's report, or knowing what prosecutors with the Southern District of New York have unearthed, or what congressional investigators will find, we already have witnessed the biggest political scandal in American history.

Historians tell Axios that the only two scandals that come close to Trump-Russia are Watergate, which led to President Richard Nixon's resignation in 1974, and the Teapot Dome scandal of the early 1920s, in which oil barons bribed a corrupt aide to President Warren Harding for petroleum leases.

Mueller has already delivered one of the biggest counterintelligence cases in U.S. history, author Garrett Graff points out — up there with Aldrich Ames (a former CIA officer convicted in 1994 of being a KGB double agent), or Julius and Ethel Rosenberg (executed in 1953 for spying for the Soviets).

Watergate yielded more charges than Mueller has so far: A total of 69 people were charged in Watergate; 48 people and 20 corporations pleaded guilty. Mueller so far has indicted 27 people; seven have been convicted or pleaded guilty.

But historians say that both Watergate and Teapot Dome were more limited because a foreign power wasn't a central player, and a much narrower band of potential offenses was under investigation.
A fourth notable scandal, the Iran-Contra affair of the mid-1980s — in which arms were traded for hostages held by Iran, with the money used to fund rebels in Nicaragua — also involved a more limited range of issues.

The "biggest" realization might strike Trump supporters as overblown or plain wrong. But consider what we already know about actions of Trump and his associates:

Scandal 1: Trump secretly paid hush money to two mistresses on the eve of his presidential victory, and lied about it. His longtime personal lawyer is going to prison after carrying out the scheme on his behalf.

The historical parallel: Bill Clinton was impeached (but acquitted by the Senate) for lying under oath about an affair with a White House intern. Clinton impeachment Article 3, passed by the House, was obstruction of justice. Earlier presidents, or their friends, had also been known to pay off mistresses.

Scandal 2: During the presidential campaign, Trump confidantes continued negotiating for a tower in Moscow, potentially one of Trump's most lucrative deals ever. He hid this from the public and lied about it. His lawyer is going to prison for making false statements to Congress about the deal.

The historical parallel: None.

Scandal 3: Russian officials had more than 100 contacts with Trump associates during the campaign and transition, including his son, his closest adviser, his lawyer, and his campaign manager. The Russians offered assistance in undermining Hillary Clinton. The FBI and other government authorities weren't alerted about this effort to subvert our election.

The historical parallel: None.

Scandal 4: Michael Flynn was national security adviser at the same time U.S. intelligence officials believed he was compromised by the Kremlin. He pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about his Russian contacts.

The historical parallel: None.

Scandal 5: Trump fired FBI Director James Comey, and told NBC's Lester Holt it was at least in part because of the Russia investigation: "[T]his Russia thing with Trump and Russia is a made-up story."

The historical parallel: In the "Saturday Night Massacre" of 1973, Nixon tried to stop the Watergate investigation by abolishing the office of Watergate prosecutor Archibald Cox; and accepting the resignation of Attorney General Elliot Richardson, and firing Deputy Attorney General William Ruckelshaus, when they refused to fire Cox.

Scandal 6: Trump overruled the advice of his lawyers and intelligence experts, and granted his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, a top-secret clearance. This so alarmed his White House chief of staff John Kelly that he recorded his opposition in a memo. Trump and his family repeatedly denied he had interfered.

The historical parallel: None.

The big picture: Presidential historian Jon Meacham tells us that this "transcends scandal — it’s a national crisis in the sense of a period of elevated stakes, high passions, and possibly permanent consequences."

"We’re in the midst of making history more than we are reflecting it."

Be smart: Trump himself might survive all of this — and even more. Republican voters seem basically unmoved by the mounting evidence.
 
More Horeshit from unhinged losers who can’t accept they got their asses beat — even with their “insurance policy”

:) have a great day!
 
Yep, the Brass at the FBI at the behest of Clinton and her paid for phony dossier attempted a coup of a duly elected President. “Insurance Policy” as Peter Strozk named it in Andy McCabe’s office.

The only Collusion with Russia was by the Democratic Party and their infinitely crooked operators.

Truth..try it on

Good day :)
 
It's easy to see how right-wing propaganda is so prevalent when you have morons like lectro as the target audience
 
I will don’t understand “phony dossier.” It clearly exists and much of it has been corroborated as far as I know. How is that phony? I get arguing how it was obtained, but that doesn’t make it phony. In this day and age it doesn’t seem like it, but words still matter. Using the correct one would strengthen an argument and not make one seem like a raving lunatic .
 
I will don’t understand “phony dossier.” It clearly exists and much of it has been corroborated as far as I know. How is that phony? I get arguing how it was obtained, but that doesn’t make it phony. In this day and age it doesn’t seem like it, but words still matter. Using the correct one would strengthen an argument and not make one seem like a raving lunatic .

Remove your mouth from maddows teat and educate yourself

Jesus
 
You haven’t done one bit of research you babbling twit.
 
Holy shit lectro was spamming this board before 6am this morning! That is the sign of a balanced life that is totally successful and not pathetic.
 
Holy shit lectro was spamming this board before 6am this morning! That is the sign of a balanced life that is totally successful and not pathetic.

says another TDS sufferer with orange digits..
 
Buddy, on a board including marquee moon you are somehow the most pathetic poster. What a mess.
 
Buddy, on a board full shithats yours fits the best.
 
The only difference between Lectro and Alex Jones is that Jones would actually show up to a fist fight he started
 
More Horeshit from unhinged losers who can’t accept they got their asses beat — even with their “insurance policy”

:) have a great day!

Yep, the Brass at the FBI at the behest of Clinton and her paid for phony dossier attempted a coup of a duly elected President. “Insurance Policy” as Peter Strozk named it in Andy McCabe’s office.

The only Collusion with Russia was by the Democratic Party and their infinitely crooked operators.

Truth..try it on

Good day :)

Spell out what has been corroborated..

You haven’t done one bit of research you babbling twit.

says another TDS sufferer with orange digits..

Buddy, on a board full shithats yours fits the best.

Lectro, honest question: is there anything Trump could do and lose your support?
 
Maybe you are referencing the article from this past week published in the National Review (clearly not the test of Rachael Maddow). "It spun old facts. It didn't give us new ones." That sure sounds like much of what was written in the dossier was corroborated but it just wasn't novel information. But what do I know, I am just a twit.
 
Back
Top