ImTheCaptain
I disagree with you
LOL. He said he couldn’t think of anybody.
i guess i misread it as a coda on his previous sentence
LOL. He said he couldn’t think of anybody.
There is no way Wake should cost more than Stanford, Harvard, or MIT. There’s just no economic rationale for it.
agreed, but
if WF can get it, and they can, then why not?
<except for, you know, Pro Humanitate>
by the way, I know at least 3 of the other schools on the list I provided are need blind in admissions; WFU is not (not sure about Duke)
There is no way Wake should cost more than Stanford, Harvard, or MIT. There’s just no economic rationale for it.
Wake used to be need blind, right? Honestly, I feel like you can figure out who has "need" and who doesn't pretty easily. I'm sure Wake still gives big scholarships to people of need.
Because of the crush of student loan debt, millennials have hit pause on saving for other life events. According to the study, at least a quarter of millennials said they are struggling with saving for retirement, buying a house and car, and moving out of their parents’ homes.
And setting your sights on an Ivy League or more expensive college might not be worth it in the long run. An analysis by Investopedia compared Ivy League colleges to public and private universities and found public school graduates receive a higher rate of return on their educational investment than those who attend an Ivy League school.