Strickland33
Well-known member
why vote for either?
because we're adults and our actions have consequences? not voting doesn't mean you can shirk responsibility for what happens as a result of other people voting.
Last edited:
why vote for either?
because we're adults and our actions have consequences? not voting doesn't mean you can shirk responsibility for what happens as a result of other people voting.
Well, I think the charges against him in Sweden, involving consensual sex with two adult women, are bullshit, which is why the first prosecutor refused to prosecute him.
Pretty obvious that Clinton and co have been floating the Russians angle as a preemptive strike. They continue to do that and float the "they could've been altered/don't trust them" angle as a way to buy time to come up with some kind of angle to spin should they ever be actually asked about the substance of the e-mails by an obedient media. They may very well have come from the Russians, but maybe not. Maybe it was just some dork in Iceland with nothing better to do than guess Podesta's password. Or maybe it actually was a 400 lb guy in his mom's basement. Given the demonstrable arrogance around everybody associated with Clinton, I'm guessing their passwords don't comply with minimum password requirements related to most government systems. In other words, their passwords are probably something like podesta#1 or hrcisabitch or just plain ol' password.
Assange is a sketchy dude, exposing a lot of underbelly. I'm not a big fan of him publishing war secrets, diplomatic tactics, etc, but private e-mails relating to political tactics would appear to be a different arena. It's pretty shifty shit, and an area where the Clintons have long claimed a vast RWC. Instead, we see through a combination of Wikileaks and FBI reports confirmation of longstanding attitudes about the Clintons-- their phoniness, their calculated demeanors, as well as the absolute worst thing that they ushered into modern politics with the neverending triangulating spin machine. They and everybody around them is rotten to the core.
If this turns out to be true it should be huge. Having said that, I have little faith the news will cover it and even less Clinton voters will care- they've made it clear there is no level of corruption that is too great for them- even if that means framing an innocent man of pedophilia.
Pretty obvious that Clinton and co have been floating the Russians angle as a preemptive strike. They continue to do that and float the "they could've been altered/don't trust them" angle as a way to buy time to come up with some kind of angle to spin should they ever be actually asked about the substance of the e-mails by an obedient media. They may very well have come from the Russians, but maybe not. Maybe it was just some dork in Iceland with nothing better to do than guess Podesta's password. Or maybe it actually was a 400 lb guy in his mom's basement. Given the demonstrable arrogance around everybody associated with Clinton, I'm guessing their passwords don't comply with minimum password requirements related to most government systems. In other words, their passwords are probably something like podesta#1 or hrcisabitch or just plain ol' password.
Assange is a sketchy dude, exposing a lot of underbelly. I'm not a big fan of him publishing war secrets, diplomatic tactics, etc, but private e-mails relating to political tactics would appear to be a different arena. It's pretty shifty shit, and an area where the Clintons have long claimed a vast RWC. Instead, we see through a combination of Wikileaks and FBI reports confirmation of longstanding attitudes about the Clintons-- their phoniness, their calculated demeanors, as well as the absolute worst thing that they ushered into modern politics with the neverending triangulating spin machine. They and everybody around them is rotten to the core.
How many voters on either side do you think would change their vote if it turned out their preferred candidate was trying to slander Assange as a pedophile?
I'll set the over under at 5.5 people.
Also, the "Holds a PhD (ABD)" move is fucking brilliant.
You are smarter than this. Even Congressional Committees run by Republicans say it's the Russians. The NSA, FBI and CIa say it's the Russians.
BTW, Ted Olson has admitted how they led the Arkansas Project to get the Clintons. It's not a myth. It was a reality.
https://www.texasobserver.org/777-the-arkansas-project-unmasked/
How many voters on either side do you think would change their vote if it turned out their preferred candidate was trying to slander Assange as a pedophile?
I'll set the over under at 5.5 people.