• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

FBI PROBING NEW CLINTON EMAILS

The lack of self awareness is incredible. Go back and read your new favorite WSJ article for great examples of "accusations as facts."
 
What did I post that wasn't a fact?

He HAS paid millions in judgments for breaching contracts. That's corrupt- This is a matter of public record.

He DID pay a $1,00,000 for illegal hiring at Trump Tower. AGAIN this is a matter of public record

He DID pay well into six figures for employment discrimination in Atlantic City for his casinos- AGAIN it's a matter of public record

His company DID get cited for racial discrimination in rental- AGAIN a matter of public record

His BKs DID stiff banks and others for tens of millions. AGAIN this is a matter of public record

Trump Modeling DID tell models to lie upon entering the US. He told them to send their portfolios so as not to get caught. Multiple former models have told this same story. Each went on tons of auditions. AGAIN we have substantial evidence of this.

Trump himself said what he done to women. He told Howard Stern. He told Chris Matthews. What's amazing is that m ore haven't come forward. He has PERSONALLY admitted to it.

There is NOTHING in my post that I c reated, isn't a matter of public record or doesn't Trump's own admissions.

I realize you blaming me for simply reporting FACTS is a way to ease your conscience for supporting a racist, thief and personal abuser of women, BUT NOTHING I posted isn't backed up.
 
WakeandBake said:
Talk more about this term "handling." Do you understand what you are even told you are supposed to be outraged about?
Click to expand...

So it's clear you're incapable of honestly looking at what she did, why she did it, why it was a problem, and why her subsequent behavior/the cover-up is also problematic. I guess it's because you're completely ignorant of what happened and the basic facts.
 
RJKarl said:
What did I post that wasn't a fact?

He HAS paid millions in judgments for breaching contracts. That's corrupt- This is a matter of public record.

He DID pay a $1,00,000 for illegal hiring at Trump Tower. AGAIN this is a matter of public record

He DID pay well into six figures for employment discrimination in Atlantic City for his casinos- AGAIN it's a matter of public record

His company DID get cited for racial discrimination in rental- AGAIN a matter of public record

His BKs DID stiff banks and others for tens of millions. AGAIN this is a matter of public record

Trump Modeling DID tell models to lie upon entering the US. He told them to send their portfolios so as not to get caught. Multiple former models have told this same story. Each went on tons of auditions. AGAIN we have substantial evidence of this.

Trump himself said what he done to women. He told Howard Stern. He told Chris Matthews. What's amazing is that m ore haven't come forward. He has PERSONALLY admitted to it.

There is NOTHING in my post that I c reated, isn't a matter of public record or doesn't Trump's own admissions.

I realize you blaming me for simply reporting FACTS is a way to ease your conscience for supporting a racist, thief and personal abuser of women, BUT NOTHING I posted isn't backed up.
Click to expand...

Well, this last post is chock full of generalizations that are all over the map, but just for one thing, you said that I should be worried that Trump would sexually abuse my 12-year old granddaughter. You have that one backed up with facts, too?
 
bobknightfan said:
Well, this last post is chock full of generalizations that are all over the map, but just for one thing, you said that I should be worried that Trump would sexually abuse my 12-year old granddaughter. You have that one backed up with facts, too?
Click to expand...

Is your Google broken again?
 
bobknightfan said:
Well, this last post is chock full of generalizations that are all over the map, but just for one thing, you said that I should be worried that Trump would sexually abuse my 12-year old granddaughter. You have that one backed up with facts, too?
Click to expand...

He may be referring to the fact Trump walked into the Miss Teen USA dressing room.
 
bobknightfan said:
Well, this last post is chock full of generalizations that are all over the map, but just for one thing, you said that I should be worried that Trump would sexually abuse my 12-year old granddaughter. You have that one backed up with facts, too?
Click to expand...

There are ZERO generalizations. Each has SPECIFICS facts and ability to check them out. He did illegal and immoral things that ARE all over the map. Everything in that post is backed up.

As to the statement about your granddaughter, here it is:

"You worry about your granddaughter going into a bathroom. You should be far more worried about what Trump might do to her if she got within his reach."

The word MIGHT has meaning.

BTW, there is a case going on about Trump's exploits with a 13yo in FL.
 
Forwarding e-mails with sensitive info on it to another account or device is (also) a security violation. Since they didn't opt to prosecute the other violations, I don't know why they'd opt to prosecute these unless there is some fibbing going on. It would be sadly appropriate if Huma ended up being the one eating shit in all this. HRC skates and her shityhead hubby also somehow escapes unscathed. Gotta wonder how far her loyalty goes if that ends up being the case.
 
BobStackFan4Life said:
So it's clear you're incapable of honestly looking at what she did, why she did it, why it was a problem, and why her subsequent behavior/the cover-up is also problematic. I guess it's because you're completely ignorant of what happened and the basic facts.
Click to expand...

I absolutely have. And the F motherfucking BI looked a lot harder than I did. I still have not seen proof of corruption, and neither did they.

Pot, meet kettle. She should not have mixed SOS email with personal, but she has had every goddamn agency in the U.S., and a few outside the U.S., searching every body cavity she has and they haven't found the corruption. You can't even articulate her supposed crimes, and you call me a shill. That's rich
 
EatLeadCommie said:
Forwarding e-mails with sensitive info on it to another account or device is (also) a security violation. Since they didn't opt to prosecute the other violations, I don't know why they'd opt to prosecute these unless there is some fibbing going on. It would be sadly appropriate if Huma ended up being the one eating shit in all this. HRC skates and her shityhead hubby also somehow escapes unscathed. Gotta wonder how far her loyalty goes if that ends up being the case.
Click to expand...

Absolute security violation. Still does not equal corruption.
 
WakeandBake said:
Absolute security violation. Still does not equal corruption.
Click to expand...

No, the corruption is evident in the CF stuff and elsewhere. The e-mail stuff has always been indicative of carelessness and arrogance which would cost anybody else their job and maybe a few years of their lives, and the entire reason between the private e-mail server in the first place is so that they could control what got out (hide stuff, basically) if they had to.
 
WakeandBake said:
Absolute security violation. Still does not equal corruption.
Click to expand...

I believe the argument is she set up the separate system so she could raise money from Clinton Foundation and do official business from same address, thus blurring public and private lines (in violation of promise she made BO).
 
EatLeadCommie said:
No, the corruption is evident in the CF stuff and elsewhere. The e-mail stuff has always been indicative of carelessness and arrogance which would cost anybody else their job and maybe a few years of their lives, and the entire reason between the private e-mail server in the first place is so that they could control what got out (hide stuff, basically) if they had to.
Click to expand...

But there is no evidence of corruption in the CF stuff. It has been examined ad nauseum and time after time they got nothing. I mean produce a smoking gun.

As for he carelessness and arrogance of using a private server, in context, she operates like basically everyone else in Washington in that regard. I get you are opposed to her politically and want to discredit in any way possible her legitimacy, but if you hold the rest of DC to that standard, they are all guilty of carelessness and arrogance. Fire them all, because I can spend 10 minutes on google and find credible sources citing dozens of sitting and retired legislators and cabinet officials since the advent of email on both sides who have behaved this way.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top