RChildress107
Well-known member
Team record is a pretty good objective standard
So Jacksonville (12-6) is better than we are (10-7)?
Team record is a pretty good objective standard
So Jacksonville (12-6) is better than we are (10-7)?
Just use ACC record
Just use ACC record
Alright, Boston College is equal to Duke, Louisville, and Virginia.
I'm saying over Manning's entire tenure. Use ACC wins as a measure of progress, since OOC schedule varies so much from year to year. I think 6 is max this year, but I'm skeptical that Wake even gets 6.
Childress, I seem to recall that you are confident Wake will get 7 ACC wins. Care to wager?
Childress, I seem to recall that you are confident Wake will get 7 ACC wins. Care to wager?
I'm saying over Manning's entire tenure. Use ACC wins as a measure of progress, since OOC schedule varies so much from year to year. I think 6 is max this year, but I'm skeptical that Wake even gets 6.
What does KP have us at, anyone with premium?
Real specific. So Manning has made no progress then.
Has us at 6 wins, with win expectancy for @NCST at 46, @Syracuse at 40, Duke at 36, Louisville at 37, and @VT at 36.
Not meaningful progress.
What does KP have us at, anyone with premium?
I'd be willing to wager on both of our metrics. I'll take the over on 6.5 ACC wins if you take the over on 58 as our final KP rank (I.e. best team since '09).
I don't want to sound dismissive of advanced metrics (or Kenpom), because I'm not, but I don't really care what the final Kenpom rating is if it doesn't result in wins. Plus, I'm too lazy to try to project what the final kenpom would be based on different scenarios, so not interested in making a bet tied to that.