• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

Official Russian Election Interference Thread

beatrix said:
the conclusions I drew was that she sold access as SecState.. *shrug* .. maybe they're bright enough to not sell access when she's pres.. i dunno...

hey friend, what's the left wing narrative on why they closed it down? all of god's work that they were doing was finished?
Click to expand...

Except the problem is she didn't do it. The people who supposedly "bought" access were a Crown Prince of a country where we have a major military base and a Nobel Laureate who we supported.
 
birdman said:
Charles-Krauthammer-on-Fox-News-with-Martha-MacCallum.png


"‘Pathetic’: Fox’s Krauthammer shreds conservatives for pretending Trump Jr wasn’t colluding with Russians"

http://www.rawstory.com/2017/07/pat...nding-trump-jr-wasnt-colluding-with-russians/
Click to expand...

Looking forward to seeing Trumpshills discredit him.

Click here for Trumpshills loving them some Krauthammer:
http://www.ogboards.com/forums/show...authammer-don-t-hurt-em?highlight=Krauthammer
 
I assume he's drawing the logical conclusion from this statement. But I don't know.

 
Outrage Sincerity Test: Do the Dems here seriously believe that the personal integrities of Carville, Begala and Clinton would have rejected opposition research from an unauthorized source?
 
jhmd2000 said:
Outrage Sincerity Test: Do the Dems here seriously believe that the personal integrities of Carville, Begala and Clinton would have rejected opposition research from an unauthorized source?
Click to expand...

I'm not a Dem but considering Gore's campaign contacted the FBI after receiving W's debate tapes in 2000...yes I do. There are certain lines you just don't cross in politics unless you are willing to risk hurting the country, destroying your career or jail time.
 
Last edited:
jhmd2000 said:
Outrage Sincerity Test: Do the Dems here seriously believe that the personal integrities of Carville, Begala and Clinton would have rejected opposition research from an unauthorized source?
Click to expand...

So you're saying this was fine. Just admit it.
 
I think what we are seeing here is people putting party and power over America. They've convinced themselves that doing whatever it takes to win is in the best interest of the country. Real ugly business.
 
Newenglanddeac said:
I'm not a Dem but considering Gore's campaign contacted the FBI after receiving W's debate tapes in 2000...yes I do. There are certain lines you just don't cross in politics unless you are willing to risk hurting the country, destroying your career or jail time.
Click to expand...

What about a contraband debate question?
 
jhmd2000 said:
What about a contraband debate question?
Click to expand...

Oh you mean like what Donna Brazille passed off to the Clinton campaign? Or perhaps what Ronald Reagan's campaign mysteriously received on Jimmy Carter's debate strategy in 1980? You should have just asked.

Neither action is ethically right but at least they kept their chicanery within the confines of our country.
 
Newenglanddeac said:
Oh you mean like what Donna Brazille passed off to the Clinton campaign? Or perhaps what Ronald Reagan's campaign mysteriously received on Jimmy Carter's debate strategy in 1980? You should have just asked.

Neither action is ethically right but at least they kept their chicanery within the confines of our country.
Click to expand...
One of the interesting things to me is the people who have done the following math:

"Bad for Hillary" = "Bad for America" = "Treason."

That's not how it works, of course.
 
jhmd2000 said:
Outrage Sincerity Test: Do the Dems here seriously believe that the personal integrities of Carville, Begala and Clinton would have rejected opposition research from an unauthorized source?
Click to expand...

Don't know and don't care what Clinton would have done. You are still completely missing the larger context who this unauthorized source was.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top