• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

2020 Democratic Presidential Nominees

Yep. They see Pete as the conniving gay villain.

This is disgusting. Identity politics is a scourge. I care about policy. I don't care if you're gay, transgender, or a green Martian. If you have policies I support, I'll support you.

I call him Mayor Cheat because he's done things to deserve that label.
 
Yep. They see Pete as the conniving gay villain.

I don't think the gay thing has anything to do with it, just as I don't think the lashing out at Warren has anything to do with her being a woman. To quote Hannibal Lector, being female or gay is incidental. Some of his supporters have a rather religious zeal and will look for any way to attack any threats to his nomination.

Edited to add witness above.
 
Last edited:
I'm not opposed to Sanders on policy grounds. Its why I wish he would have fucked off and let Warren run. But something tells me the section2s and mhbs of the world would not have been as vociferous in their support of Warren, for reasons no one can explain.

I mean, to be fair, nobody on here really gave a shit about Warren. I think maybe Shoo, itc, and I have been Warren supporters?

We have a few Bernie Bros, a few early Pete adopters and one full-on Pete Pal, one Biden defector who has jumped straight to Bloomberg, and a whole lotta words that I didn't read from cville.
 
I don't think the gay thing has anything to do with it, just as I don't think the lashing out at Warren has anything to do with her being a woman. To quote Hannibal Lector, being female or gay is incidental. Some of his supporters have a rather religious zeal and will look for any way to attack any threats to his nomination.

Edited to add witness above.

And once again, the world would be a much better place if people stop carrying about what random candidate "supporters" said on Twitter.
 
I mean, to be fair, nobody on here really gave a shit about Warren. I think maybe Shoo, itc, and I have been Warren supporters?

We have a few Bernie Bros, a few early Pete adopters and one full-on Pete Pal, one Biden defector who has jumped straight to Bloomberg, and a whole lotta words that I didn't read from cville.

Don't forget about ABC and the other handful of "Bloomberg RULES" folks.

Warren is better qualified than Sanders, a progressive, and not at as much of a risk to start drooling in the forseeable future. Voters are going to choose whomever they want. But I'd sure as hell rather be in a situation where she was running with Sanders full support than having him as the nominee.

I hope he proves me wrong and ends up being a great candidate and better president.
 
I don't think the gay thing has anything to do with it, just as I don't think the lashing out at Warren has anything to do with her being a woman. To quote Hannibal Lector, being female or gay is incidental. Some of his supporters have a rather religious zeal and will look for any way to attack any threats to his nomination.

Edited to add witness above.

It's called defending your candidate from unfair attacks. Unless you believe Bernie supporters should just bend over and take it? Ph just concocted a sweeping generalization out of thin air, implying Bernie bros are homophobes. That's patently absurd and is a disgusting way to weaponize identity politics.
 
Did we ever get confirmation of BSF4L being S2M? I’m starting to buy that theory. I hope he is just to know BSF is ok.
 
It's called defending your candidate from unfair attacks. Unless you believe Bernie supporters should just bend over and take it? Ph just concocted a sweeping generalization out of thin air, implying Bernie bros are homophobes. That's patently absurd and is a disgusting way to weaponize identity politics.

just stop it
 
Gotta love it when people use homophobic language to defend themselves from being called homophobes.
 
I have to admit during my time away I got some laughs and head shaking from here.

Over the past twenty years, one of the least controversial posters has been ChrisL. But because he won't kiss their butts, Townie, MHB, MDMH, Strickland, Juice and others have made the mostly boring ChrisL into a massive boogeyman and target of their vitriol.

Their posts towards him have been demanding 100% Trumpian fealty to their left wing ideas or else. Be careful what you wish for, you could drive some voters to Trump.

Way to go guys!!! Who would ever thought ChrisL would engender such hate and attacks, but you've done it.
 
if Section 2 is BSF4L he’s gonna have to atone for his bat shit Hilary conspiracy theories before anyone can take him seriously.

LK please confirm !
 
if Section 2 is BSF4L he’s gonna have to atone for his bat shit Hilary conspiracy theories before anyone can take him seriously.

LK please confirm !
Lest we not forget that he was a popular poster during the 2016 primary season on these here politics boards.
 
Lest we not forget that he was a popular poster during the 2016 primary season on these here politics boards.

The parallels are pretty stunning down to the weird cultural reference/wake reference mashup as a handle.
 
Yea. I’m too lazy but someone should post some of his greatest hits so we can have a reference point for when he posts in 2020.
 
Yeah it isn't like the Sanders campaign has ever raised any objections over how a caucus or primary has been administered.

hold on to your whatabouts

if you're trying to figure out why Perez freaked out over Twitter, then I think we have found the culprit
 
i say we nullify Iowa's results until after the USVI primary and then announce the "winner"
 
I mean Michael Bloomberg is objectively a piece of shit. Talk to anybody who lived under his time as mayor and they'll agree. I would take anybody in this field including Marianne, Tulsi, and Bennet over that clown.

oh, pete


Nice job posting the Bloomberg take on Iowa.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top