macktheknife
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2011
- Messages
- 2,966
- Reaction score
- 624
Saying he shouldn't be on the depth chart is hardly "ripping" him. He has gapping limitations to his game. You're free to disagree but being a straight up asshole doesn't support your case. Agree to disagree.
Apologize if this is Haas, but the ESPN crew working the FSU/WF game on Saturday is:
Play-by-Play: Mark Jones
Analyst: Robert Griffin III
Reporter: Quint Kessenich
RGIII will be returning to Groves after leading Baylor to win at WF in 2009.
*"gaping"
Where should you be on the depth chart of posters? If you can't even spell correctly, what kind of hot takes are you going to make?
It's Stan Gable, he got his girlfriend stolen by a nerd, what do you expect?
I don't know. My opinions about him are solely based upon one post.
Lulz - So the offense should be wholly responsible now for scoring points and controlling time of possession because the defense can't get stops?
So why are we wasting resources on a defensive coaching staff or even recruiting defensive players?
Why?
Because he’s a top tier veteran ESPN play by play guy. I also typically associate him with doing NBA games with Doris Burke.
Our offensive yards per play last year was 82nd. I know that you are one of the people who overrates our offense and underrates our defense due to high scores when a lot of that was due to the number of plays that are in our games.
Our defense did do it its job by holding an elite offense to 24 points late in the 3rd quarter. If the offense had been able to maintain some possession and burn some clock that would have been enough to win the game
Sorry Conor. At least I remembered what you wrote. 😀
Today it was announced that this is the ESPN 4K production this Saturday. Looking forward to the game, but my best bud is an FSU grad, so I'll be pulling against Wake on the 88" 4K projection setup before my Pack has a "too close for comfort" matchup against Furman.
We could lose.
I'm serious.
If we had kept UNC to a reasonable number of possessions in that game we would probably held them into the thirties and everybody would have been talking about our opportunistic defense.
Yeah, Hartman was more a problem than Andersen in that game. Not that Andersen played great.