By last two I meant Shoo and Chris. Lol mittens.
When people say politics is fantasy football to some, it’s posts like the last two they’re talking about. The material implications of the legislation are far less important than Ws and Ls of the teams they’re watching. If Romney actually went all Great Society anti poverty of course I’d go vote for him, in a heartbeat. This is just a weird Mormon one off. Anyway Matt Bruenig’s point if anyone was interested is that the $5k total in the Romney plan is more money distributed in an easier way than any of the dem child tax credits than made it to BBB. If you actually follow the issues themselves tho (again instead of just playing fantasy) the Gillibrand plan was the best of all, but it never made it particularly far.
No need to throw a hissy fit or bring emotion into any of this, guys. Just grow up and hate it and pull the lever every four years and eat shit like the rest of us.
I vote for the party that actually gets some social welfare enacted when the other party is almost unanimously opposed to it. You throw hissy fits about that party compared to some hypothetical party of your own mind.No need to throw a hissy fit or bring emotion into any of this, guys. Just grow up and hate it and pull the lever every four years and eat shit like the rest of us.
I vote for the party that actually gets some social welfare enacted when the other party is almost unanimously opposed to it. You throw hissy fits about that party compared to some hypothetical party of your own mind.
Aren't false positives incredibly rare? And false negatives much more likely?out of the 10 rapid tests we've done at home, we've had 3 false positives
Aren't false positives incredibly rare? And false negatives much more likely?
Everybody back up, we got a voter here