KillSwofford
Banhammer'd
I was here long before you were, sweetheart. So instead of whining about this board why don't you scurry on over to the Brickyard. Your opinion of yourself and your own posts is really fascinating, but on this thread you have offered nothing but excuses and whining and the thing hasn't even happened yet.
What have I offered now? Did I call that shit or what? The first thing that went through your mind when Crowley interrupted Romney on the Libya question should have been "wow, that KillSwofford guy nailed it."
And thus the conservative whining begins.
you're a crybaby
first of all, do you use the term "libs" in everyday conversation? as in say it out loud to other people? as I've said before, I've found anyone who uses that term to be incredibly lame. secondly, regardless of the location, host, etc, there is a bipartisan commission that sets up all the debates, with the parties and campaigns having to agree to all the particulars. so regardless of the location, moderator, etc, all was agreed upon by the Romney Campaign and GOP ahead of time. it's not like Obama is like "hey, next debate is in NYC, FYI."
I probably am more in line with the Green than Libertarians, but I think there may be a significant movement toward libertarians from more established folks on the right. I don't think a vote for Stein would do as much as voting Libertarian to promote the viability of a third party or prompt a shift in tone of a current party (and even still, that may be wishful thinking on my part). Voting for Johnson would be a vote against personal policy beliefs in favor of the need for reform of the system. Right now it's up to the president to sway me to vote for him. I'm probably 60/40 in favor of him right now.
:rofl:
You're not going to leave all this insuffering are you?