• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

Crooked hillary

8eajmte1gurx.jpg
 
"A 2011 audit of the Clinton Foundation requested by Chelsea Clinton" Must be true...
 
BobStackFan4Life said:
Former U.S. Attorney: Agents See FBI Chief Comey as a ‘Dirty Cop’
“I know that inside the FBI there is a revolt,” Joseph diGenova tells The American Spectator. “There is a revolt against the director. The people inside the bureau believe the director is a dirty cop. They believe that he threw the [Hillary Clinton email] case. They do not know what he was promised in return. But the people inside the bureau who were involved in the case and who knew about the case are talking to former FBI people expressing their disgust at the conduct of the director.”

The loss of faith in the bureau chief stems in part from a dishonest rendering of the decision not to indict Mrs. Clinton as unanimous rather than unilateral and in part from the bureau’s decision to destroy evidence in the case and grant blanket immunity to Clinton underlings for no possible prosecutorial purpose.

“There is a consensus among the employees that the director has lost all credibility and that he cannot lead the bureau,” diGenova explains. “They are comparing him to L. Patrick Gray, the disgraced former FBI director who threw Watergate papers into the Potomac River. The resistance to the director has made the agency incapable of action. It has been described to me as a depression within the agency unlike anything that anyone has ever seen within the bureau. The director’s public explanation for the unorthodox investigation are viewed by people in the bureau as sophomoric and embarrassing.”

Comey maintained in July that he came to the decision to recommend not indicting Clinton for the inclusion of classified material in 110 emails stored on a private server based on an “entirely apolitical and professional” investigation despite conceding that others in a similar spot would face “consequences” and that “evidence of potential violations” existed. He insisted then, “No outside influence of any kind was brought to bear.”

But agents trained to sniff out malfeasance smell something rotten here.

“When the director said that it was a unanimous decision not to recommend prosecution, that was a lie,” diGenova points out. “In fact, the people involved in the case were outraged at his decision, which he made by himself. When people realized that he was lying publicly about their role and when they knew he had approved of the destruction of laptops that were subject to congressional subpoena, that flipped the switch.”
http://spectator.org/former-u-s-attorney-agents-see-fbi-chief-comey-as-a-dirty-cop/
Click to expand...

The American Spectator...lol

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine...e-and-death-of-the-american-spectator/302343/
 
diGenova has been a joke for almost twenty years. No one who isn't far right takes him seriously.
 
I would have to think nobody is stupid enough to tamper with an election and then tweet about it.
 
TownieDeac said:
It has become a meme now, to post about ways you're "rigging" the election. The idea is to get a news organization to report on it. Seems like rubes like bsf are the only ones falling for it so far, but there are plenty of examples of some of the funny folks I follow on Twitter doing it.
Click to expand...

Nope. I saw it. Read his responses. Was skeptical. But still posted it figuring people might find it interesting. Not all of my posts are hard hitting.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top