• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

2017 Masters Contest - Doofus WINS!

Deacsfan27 said:
Typical logical fallacy by Bob. Equating the fact that because Numbers picked Bubba and Fatrick, he has to like them. Which is clearly not the case, and a faulty assumption.

Bubba and Fatrick ARE jackasses.
Click to expand...

Not necessarily true.. Good example is my pick of Mickelson. I don't like him, either....but he fit the number I needed. If I had 7 points to spare, I would have taken Matsuyama instead of Phil.

Hate to sound like RJ here, but I only responded because numbers went out of his way to blast a guy that I liked. That wasn't by accident.
 
bobknightfan said:
Not necessarily true.. Good example is my pick of Mickelson. I don't like him, either....but he fit the number I needed. If I had 7 points to spare, I would have taken Matsuyama instead of Phil.

Hate to sound like RJ here, but I only responded because numbers went out of his way to blast a guy that I liked. That wasn't by accident.
Click to expand...

Yeah, that's my point Bob, you assumed that because Numbers picked them to be on his team that he must like them. That's not true.
 
No, bob, you sound like yourself...bitter, mean-spirited and with transactional, ever-changing "principles".
 
We have enough threads already dedicated to this pissing match. Let's focus this one on more important things; like Adam Scott's all-beige outfit, or Sandy Lyle being in the current Top 10.
 
Deacsfan27 said:
Yeah, that's my point Bob, you assumed that because Numbers picked them to be on his team that he must like them. That's not true.
Click to expand...

Well, if I thought that people only picked players they liked, how do you account for my picking Mickelson? I don't like him any more than I like Watson or Reed...maybe even less...but I picked him on my team this week. And if I could pick a guy that I didn't personally like, why would I think that numbers couldn't do the same thing? As I said, the only reason I responded was because he went out of his way to blast a guy that I liked. I don't know of any other poster for whom he would have gone to that much trouble. Anyway, glad that you agree with me about Bubba & Patrick Reed. That is rather surprising, too.....that you would ever go on record in agreeing with me about anything.

For Sleepy: This is my last post on that subject. Sorry for the distraction...but it would never have gotten started had numbers not taken it upon himself to attack me by going thru Lee Westwood. I had not made any negative comments about anything at the time.
 
yea numbers mentioning Lee Westwood was a pretty vicious attack, i agree
 
bobknightfan said:
Well, if I thought that people only picked players they liked, how do you account for my picking Mickelson? I don't like him any more than I like Watson or Reed...maybe even less...but I picked him on my team this week. And if I could pick a guy that I didn't personally like, why would I think that numbers couldn't do the same thing? As I said, the only reason I responded was because he went out of his way to blast a guy that I liked. I don't know of any other poster for whom he would have gone to that much trouble. Anyway, glad that you agree with me about Bubba & Patrick Reed. That is rather surprising, too.....that you would ever go on record in agreeing with me about anything.

For Sleepy: This is my last post on that subject. Sorry for the distraction...but it would never have gotten started had numbers not taken it upon himself to attack me by going thru Lee Westwood. I had not made any negative comments about anything at the time.
Click to expand...

He literally didn't mention anything about you. He responded to a post that you said about liking Westwood and said he didn't like Westwood. That's how message boards usually operate.

Fin.
 
Deacsfan27 said:
He literally didn't mention anything about you. He responded to a post that you said about liking Westwood and said he didn't like Westwood. That's how message boards usually operate.

Fin.
Click to expand...

No you are speaking French. to bob, that makes you an enemy to everythang Amurcan!
 
Last edited:
Sleepy said:
We have enough threads already dedicated to this pissing match. Let's focus this one on more important things; like Adam Scott's all

+1
All things Masters should reflect class, dignity and integrity
Click to expand...
 
I didn't attack you old man, I said I don't like Lee Westwood. Get your face out of your oatmeal, grow a spine, and put me back on ignore so you don't go into cardiac arrest by getting that BP up too high.
 
I'm in with:

Rory McIlroy
Jordan Spieth
Jon Rahm
Thomas Pieters
Rafael Cabrera-Bello
Hudson Swafford

RCB and Swafford not getting it done so far....
 
Rory McIlroy (0)
Jordan Spieth (0)
Justin Rose (25)
Lee Westwood (80)
Angel Cabrera (150)
Steve Stricker (150)

405
 
Lots of people also have Furyk and Zach Johnson. Both are +5. If RCB drops a little more, we could have a lot of people not make the cut.
 
WFUPH said:
Rory McIlroy (0)
Jordan Spieth (0)
Justin Rose (25)
Lee Westwood (80)
Angel Cabrera (150)
Steve Stricker (150)

405
Click to expand...

You should be VERY, VERY scared. We think damn near alike with 5 of 6 of the same players.

Or we could share the win!
 
Do I need to send some $$$ somewhere, or is this just for bragging rights? Cause I just peeked at the leaderboard and given the fact I sent in DJ on Tuesday, took ole faithfuls: Zach Johnson and almost last place Furyk, I got nothing good coming this way.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top