Forbes wants to have two point guards. This past season that duo was supposed to be Ituka and Boopie. Now Forbes needs both the starter and the backup. Grad and incoming soph for those two spots?I'm pretty confident in the fact that Wake Forest was looking to recruit a guard that would compete/possibly play over Boopie.
Worth saying that Sallis's mocks are now consistently in the 2nd round.I don't think this is an indictment. There are resources to retain players. One has to be smart about those resources.
I don’t know. It’s actually kinda fun if you can do it well. I enjoyed a year of Appleby and Alondes more than two years of Tony Chennault for example.Renting players 1 season at a time fucking sucks.
As of now, I don't really know what the makeup of that position will be in the portal. Of course, there's Parker (from what I've been told) coming back. Juke coming in. Cam with the chance to come back.Forbes wants to have two point guards. This past season that duo was supposed to be Ituka and Boopie. Now Forbes needs both the starter and the backup. Grad and incoming soph for those two spots?
This is definitely a take
The folks over at RTQ NIL do a pretty good job explaining how the deals work and the payment structures/timelines when you inquire as a potential donor. IMO it's worth talking to them to get an idea of the current landscape.
Like the way you think.
hard disagreeCorrect - And there is zero excuse for any non-troll account who posts on this board but doesn't donate something to RTQ
I don’t have any current need for any athlete’s name, image, or likeness, so not sure what I’d be paying forCorrect - And there is zero excuse for any non-troll account who posts on this board but doesn't donate something to RTQ
Yeah don't disagree. Time will tell on this one obviously if we're able to get someone superior, but I have my doubts that we can bring in a Sallis and Boopie level guard tandem again.
A seat at the big boy tableI don’t have any current need for any athlete’s name, image, or likeness, so not sure what I’d be paying for
I know what’s he saying but Parker was essentially 0 for March so not sure if that was the second half “emergence” he was referencing or something else. Maybe i missed him scoring 31 vs. AppyIs it really?
Try to share / explain as much as I can without being compromisingWe’re lucky to have you on this board, really appreciate all of your information.
Parker obviously in a slump, but I felt like he was a decent defender. The instincts were there, and the strength/athleticism can improve. I just trust good shooters to figure it out. Parker is obviously a very good shooter. His trajectory is higher than Boopie’s over the next two years overall IMO, and I absolutely love Boopie’s game.I know what’s he saying but Parker was essentially 0 for March so not sure if that was the second half “emergence” he was referencing or something else. Maybe i missed him scoring 31 vs. Appy