WakeForestRanger
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2011
- Messages
- 22,959
- Reaction score
- 1,169
Seems like a good move to replace Iowa with a more representative state to go first.
That’s blatantly payback for Biden’s primary win and Jaime Harrison bringing home the bacon.
And as a native North Carolinian, it’s offensive that SC supposedly represents Black Democrats. And if the goal is to make sure Black Democrats have a say, Georgia is a swing state and has a higher Black population than SC.
I agree with what you're saying - opening in South Carolina is a bad idea when other, larger, and more winnable Southern states are available like GA and NC. But it does make sense in that this is clearly political payback for Clyburn's support in SC in 2020, and a nod to Clyburn's continuing influence in the party and Congress. I'm not saying that I agree with it, but it does make sense in that perspective. Still a terrible idea though.Makes no sense.
MDMH, to take your point further, one of the big challenges for Dems is getting enough turnout from young voters, Black voters, and Latino voters in large metro areas in swing states to overcome Republican margins in the rest of the state. So the goal is to run up margins in Atlanta, Detroit, Milwaukee, Philly, Pittsburgh, Las Vegas, etc. They also need to make inroads in Miami, Tampa, Orlando, Dallas, Austin, Houston, Cincinnati, Columbus, etc.
So why start the primary in a state without a Top 70 metro area?
This is probably part of the package he owes Clyburn for that 2020 endorsement.