Wakeforest22890
Snowpom
To be fair that is how averages work. We need to find the MEDIANWake “average” of 500k is based on 3 games with 6 million viewers and 9 games of unknowns which are counted as zeros
To be fair that is how averages work. We need to find the MEDIANWake “average” of 500k is based on 3 games with 6 million viewers and 9 games of unknowns which are counted as zeros
Thanks for the trip down memory lane. Speaking of which, I do wonder what Jessica is up to these days…RJ is like that crazy hot ex, couldn't stand her when you were with her but the sex was so good you stayed longer than you should have. But now it's been some time and you've forgotten all about the crazy and kinda miss her.
To be fair that is how averages work. We need to find the MEDIAN
SMU gives us DFW market while taking no revenue. I know Hale is reporting it is a minimal financial gain, and he knows more than any of us, but adding SMU with them taking no revenue is definitely a financial gain. I don’t think anyone truly knows what the financial boost is, but there are also large ‘soft’ benefits such as solidifying ACC as the #3 conference and setting ACC up to potentially go after the 5 Texas schools in the Big 12 and changing the little brother narrative. If we don’t grab SMU Stanford Cal then Big 12 (or B1G / SEC) will. GoR is a good defense but we need an offense.No to SMU. There is a reason that they are willing to give up a share for years. There are 5 Texas schools in the Big 12 and one in the SEC. So, the ACC is settling for the 7th most attractive school in Texas? When was the last time any SMU football or basketball game generated any buzz? This would be a move to just make a move.
WGAF?!?
Here is 2021.
I also think this whole thing is skewed based on what channel the game is on.This is informative, but those numbers are highly skewed by scheduling popular teams. Seems like taking the mean viewers per game would be the most accurate way to measure that
But it’s ahead of High Point!is SMU a good school or just somewhere rich folks send their mediocre kids? I knew a few of those growing up.
ETA: tied with State and Indiana in US News. So I think my idea of it holds.
why start now?Can we please agree to stop posting flawed data assuming nobody watched games we all watched?
Wake Law graduates like me who don’t like the school being called second tier by Biff.WGAF?!?
Again, WGAF. it's a god damn message board.Wake Law graduates like me who don’t like the school being called second tier by Biff.
Then you attended a second tier university. Because if the law school is second tier, so is the university.Apparently entire identity is wrapped up in attending a second tier law school.
ok. I went to Wake Forest. A Second Tier University.Then you attended a second tier university. Because if the law school is second tier, so is the university.
Huh? Clemson has more natties in the last decade than the entire Big 10 combined.I don't see Clemson being Big 10 material. They already have programs that are equivalent to them, and they are about to have a lot more money.
Maybe as a non-AAU rural buddy for Nebraska?
I think Clemson could turn out sucking in the Big 10.
FSU, not really a B10 school either. But it is Florida. If I were the B10, I'd rather have Miami.
My guy, I say this with the weight of experience, as a law grad and currently looking for a job in one of the biggest legal markets in the country, we are most definitely not first tier on the national stage.I just read that about the top 14, but US News designates law schools 51-100 to be second tier and third tier to be 100-150. #22 obviously isn’t close to being second tier.
You mean the VT that has a grand total of one double digit win season in its entire history when Frank Beamer wasn't the coach?Yeah wouldn’t VT be a much bigger draw from there? And seems like the B10 likes schools with engineering and ag stuff.