The points are valid but using dook and UNC as examples of teams that lost talent to the pros? Really? When Wake can bring in 4 ACC starters and NBA 1st rounders in the next year we can talk about that.
Not to go dv7 but its amazing to me people are invested enough to know the specifics of other team's injuries and roster situations.
Not to go dv7 but its amazing to me people are invested enough to know the specifics of other team's injuries and roster situations.
Those are teams that weren't trying to dig out of a huge hole though...and then lost the 2 best players in the first two classes.Also talks about losses that FSU had and Clemson and Notre Dame having huge injuries this season and not performing nearly as horribly as Wake did. Good points all around by Dan.
Those are teams that weren't trying to dig out of a huge hole though...and then lost the 2 best players in the first two classes.
His key point is totally legit. "You play with who you have and Manning, in his four years as head coach, hasn’t stockpiled enough good players to overcome the loss of two others. That’s on him, and no one else." Last year everyone thought he recruited great and now it doesn't look very good. Besides seeing guys go to the pros (or other schools) and not recruiting well the year of the Giles war, he seems to like developing projects, and that's a bit risky too. He's just not a good enough coach to win with lesser talent.
sure, but the guy needed to keep his job
Also talks about losses that FSU had and Clemson and Notre Dame having huge injuries this season and not performing nearly as horribly as Wake did. Good points all around by Dan.
Sort like people that helped the Nazi's in the war 'I didn't agree with them but what was I supposed to do'?