Okay, so I will ask this to you again, and please answer it. If there is no right to sexual privacy, and there is/was no documented transgender bathroom safety issue in Charlotte, then what is the need for the Charlotte ordinance? What right of transgenders is being affirmed by the Charlotte ordinance allowing them to choose their restroom if there is no right to sexual privacy?
Because using your own logic, if there is no right to sexual privacy then there is absolutely no rational basis for the Charlotte ordinance, because it shouldn't matter if a male to female transgender has to use the men's room. But it clearly does matter to the transgenders, as they do not want to be in the men's room for some reason, hence the Charlotte ordinance. So why do they apparently have a right to sexual privacy but the other 99.7% does not?