DeaconSig
Well-known member
I mean, Trump wouldn’t be lobbying against an invasion of Rafah.
The lobbying is less interesting to me than the providing of weaponsI mean, Trump wouldn’t be lobbying against an invasion of Rafah.
The difference between providing weapons and encouraging their use isn't as trivial as you seem to think it is.The lobbying is less interesting to me than the providing of weapons
Me when I don’t vote Biden and Trump funds Israel even harder while also pissing on our democracy and the rights of marginalized groups:
Providing weapons is awful. And should stop. But there is pretty significant daylight between the two positions. Whether that matters is up to you.
huh?
These are not good-faith posts.Can you please explain the daylight? Genuinely curious, thanks.
These are not good-faith posts.
Keeping Israel out of Rafah, to the extent it happens, will save lives. The Biden admin has put a ton of effort into trying to prevent that invasion.
Does it absolve the admin for providing weapons and money? Hell no. But it is something that distinguishes this admin from the Trump admin.
I don’t expect that to matter to a lot of folks. And I don’t blame them.
the democrats electoral strategy in a nutshellI still can’t understand how anyone can view the current events and decide not to vote for Donald Trumps opponent because they can’t perfectly solve the israeli/palestine 80 year conflict.
Faking it to try and influence policy, sure…. But actually doing it… in a swing state, just can’t comprehend …
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No one expects Biden to “solve” anything. I only demand that he not materially and rhetorically support the mass murder and ethnic cleansing of Palestinians.
Slippery slope - might end up opposing genocide.Feels like the goalpost would definitely move if the US wasn’t provide any material support, the next line would be why isn’t the US strongly disavowing, the next line would be why isn’t the US applying sanctions, and then the next line would be why isn’t the US physically stopping them.
Israel literally would be unable to do militarily what it is doing without US and European support, so this line of thinking makes no senseFeels like the goalpost would definitely move if the US wasn’t provide any material support, the next line would be why isn’t the US strongly disavowing, the next line would be why isn’t the US applying sanctions, and then the next line would be why isn’t the US physically stopping them.