• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

NFL Year 2023. Kansas City Chiefs Win Super Bowl LVIII. Defeat 49ers in Overtime. 25-22.

Lions take lead with 23 seconds left on successful 2 pt conversion.
Or not.
Ineligle receiver
 
Bad throw by Goff on third two point try. Good (higher) throw and its two.
 
CDeacMan said:
Wow

They better have been absolutely sure the guy didn’t report
Click to expand...
Replay showed he didn't. He was covered by #70 who did report. So pick'em fouls. Illegal touching or ineligible downfield.
 
Deaconblue said:
Replay showed he didn't. He was covered by #70 who did report. So pick'em fouls. Illegal touching or ineligible downfield.
Click to expand...
He wasn’t covered was he? He was end man on LOS

If not you are right and it would have been an illegal formation penalty anyway
 
Last edited:
what’s the purpose of having to report for eligibility?

why isn’t it just based on where a guy is in the formation?
 
In other words defenses get to key off of jersey numbers, thus any time an offense wants to make a non-eligible number eligible, they must declare
 
but why?

if you’re on the end of the line or in the backfield then you should be an eligible receiver, who cares what number

defense should be responsible for monitoring that
 
JuiceCrewAllStar said:
but why?

if you’re on the end of the line or in the backfield then you should be an eligible receiver, who cares what number

defense should be responsible for monitoring that
Click to expand...
that sounds chaotic for refs and players, but would add an interesting twist for defenses
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top