Unlike some people, though, I can leave the board. I'm not addicted to posting every single day of my life like several people on these boards. Just recently, for example, I didn't post for five full weeks....from July 2nd until August 6th. We have several posters who are incapable of that. Tell you what, I'll offer a deal that will gtive you a chance to get rid of me forever: If either RJ or PH will go five weeks without making a post on these boards like I just did, I will leave the boards forever and never post here again.
Come on RJ & PH....show me that you are not addicted. I'm sure that lots of posters will be pulling for you....but after 140,000 posts I think both of you are addicted and it is impossible for you to go just five weeks without posting.
As a Richmonder, I fully expect Monument Avenue to be the next event. Richmond has an incredible opportunity to build an educational experience that can progress from the Lumpkin slave museum along Monument Avenue and ending at the Arthur Ashe monument. Tack on an hour and a half ride to Appomattox, and see the room the Civil War essentially ended in. Read the way the surrender took place, and the actions that took place afterward that resulted in possibly the only Civil War that has not been repeated multiple times. The story of Lee taking communion with a black man in Richmond days after he surrendered the Army of Northern Virginia is an event that has importance and should not be ignored or removed. Incorporate history and context with these locations, tell the story, and learn from it.
Why do non-racist people like to lump themselves with the "actual racists?"
Nobody is smearing non-racists as racists but you're asking this question.
The biggest example of this phenomenon is obviously when Hillary gave a speech specifically separating the racists from non-racists. Non-racists got all offended and claimed Hillary called them racists.
Why would they choose to be identified as racists instead of hard working Americans frustrated with government?
For some of them, probably because they have had experiences where liberals have lumped them into that racist (or racially ignorant/insensitive) group. So, when a "liberal" makes broad negative generalizations about people she disagrees with, they assume she might be including them in that group (since it has happened before).
Obviously, plenty just have blindly emotional responses to people who have opposing political views.
Conservatives often cling to binary distinctions of "right and wrong" as it pertains to sexuality or religion, yet they are super fucking liberal and permissive when it comes to hateful right-wing political idealogy. Let Somalian Muslims in Michigan build public shrines to Sharia, let them march down the streets with "death to infidels" signs and see how far that 1st amendment permissiveness goes.
And "talk to them" means one acceptable outcome of having a discourse/losing an argument with Nazis is genocide
People blocking the freeway in Oakland or protesting at a Cardinals baseball game are obviously trying to annoy your privileged ass. Their problems obviously werent a big enough concern for you, so they are going to interrupt your life.Or there are people that find you both annoying. Just stop granting the douchebags permits and have them experience the law and order policing they seem to love so much when they get policed. Problem solved.
People blocking the freeway in Oakland or protesting at a Cardinals baseball game are obviously trying to annoy your privileged ass. Their problems obviously werent a big enough concern for you, so they are going to interrupt your life.
According to the Palmas of the world, people with actual fucking beefs should find a time, place, and method thats most convenient for him to pay attention.
Does anyone here know anyone personally who identifies as a white nationalist?
I get that. But it means they are choosing not to be called hard working people who don't think government works for them.