DeaconCav06
Dickie Hemric
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2011
- Messages
- 30,884
- Reaction score
- 5,010
Seems like a small firm to be handling such a big case.
A lot of wake connections though.
A lot of wake connections though.
Seems like a small firm to be handling such a big case.
A lot of wake connections though.
Seems like a small firm to be handling such a big case.
A lot of wake connections though.
The ACC firm is made up of former smith Moore partners. Small in numbers but def big firm attorneys.
In all my years taking civil cases to trial in Guilford County, I have never seen the lawyers that signed that Counterclaim even darken the halls of the courthouse.
Their Counterclaim is a joke and has zero chance. Typical Maryland.
Agree. Maryland is desperately trying to entice the ACC into settling the case for less than the $50 million. This counterclaim is ridiculous.
I would say, however, that the weakest part of the ACC's case is the claim that damages amount to the $50 million, when the ACC was able to recruit Louisville to replace Maryland and actually got a more lucrative TV contract that remains in effect despite the Maryland exit. The ACC is claiming that the exit fee was established by the league by-laws, but it looks more like punitive damages than actual losses due to breach of contract.
But do they need to establish the damages? They have already agreed contractually to what the damages would be...
It is important to remember that it was a Maryland fan who managed to shoot himself in the ass while seated in the Greensboro Coliseum during the ACCT.
And that is all I have to say on this matter.
This whole thing is so sad. Just make MD pay $20-40mm and call it a night.