Deadbolt
Well-known member
I wonder if there was this much resistance to building things like the interstate when it was first proposed.
I wonder if there was this much resistance to building things like the interstate when it was first proposed.
The interstate system was promoted in the interests of national defense.
Parking lots and roads, no need for large space eating solar farms. Unless they're in South Dakota.
Which is also one of the best arguments for energy independence in general, and for non-oil sources specifically.
Don't forget rooftops.
Which is also one of the best arguments for energy independence in general, and for non-oil sources specifically.
Agree completely. The only way I differ from the liberal viewpoint on energy independence is that I believe nuclear power is vital to any plan.
I believe San Bernardino County in CA is the largest county in the Lower 48 and is basically devoid of people. You could make massive solar and wind farms there. All that land is empty.
There are vast spaces in AZ and NV that are the same.
I posted a video about those a few weeks ago. The potential is very high.
Germany made a serious mistake going away from nuclear power. America should make a goal to get at least 80% of its power from nuclear power.
11 maps that explain the US energy system
http://www.vox.com/2014/6/12/5803998/the-us-energy-system-in-11-maps
I believe San Bernardino County in CA is the largest county in the Lower 48 and is basically devoid of people. You could make massive solar and wind farms there. All that land is empty.
There are vast spaces in AZ and NV that are the same.
19% from nuclear power? un-fucking-acceptable.
You think it should be more, or less?