Not sure how describing the height of your preferred economic approach is a "stilted premise."
Classifying how to administer and regulate our economy under a single theory is stilted. Put down the conservative monolith and back slowly away.
Not sure how describing the height of your preferred economic approach is a "stilted premise."
Classifying how to administer and regulate our economy under a single theory is stilted. Put down the conservative monolith and back slowly away.
You can't even describe when that single theory worked the best.
So the free market was at its best when it was selling human beings.
Sales continued. I think jhmd2000 is saying it was best when you could IMPORT human beings.
I'm curious at what point your parents first concluded that your ship had sailed, and that you weren't on it.
ITC with no free market there was no way for Tuffalo to be traded or sold. Government regulation resulted in him being stuck.
You guys are not really equating free markets with slavery, are you?
Don't be stupid. You know what we're saying.
history, experience and most board posters for their own families prefer synecdoche like "two parent household"
You guys are not really equating free markets with slavery, are you?
You guys are not really equating free markets with slavery, are you?
Guys the important thing is that there were no restrictions on trade. If yall want to argue about semantics, slavery this import that, then go ahead but at the end of the day the white males were coming out pretty damn well.