Also, 1 and 1. Would probably hit it.
I mean, why not ?
I mean, why not ?
Why all this talk about prevention when much of the protest was about the failure to react.
Why all this talk about prevention when much of the protest was about the failure to react.
The entire document from Concerned Students 1950s is about preventing a hostile/oppressive atmosphere to minorities. The protest is that preventative measures have not been taken. How can prevention be a strawman, it's what the protest is all about.Because they need a straw man. They're the only ones talking prevention.
This board gets real ugly when it comes to defending racism. People will contort themselves all sort of ways to defend racism without appearing racist using free speech and anti-PC arguments.
My recent observations:
1) Click was not faculty in the (prestigious) J-School, but the School of Communication in the College of Arts & Sciences. The J-School has held a vote to officially disavow her "courtesy appointment," but the results of the vote haven't been reported. The Chair of the Department of Communication has also come out in support of the student journalists. He didn't mention Click. Dean of Arts & Sciences said her behavior was "absolutely unacceptable".
2) She is (as far as I can tell) an untenured assistant professor, having taught at the university in some capacity since 2003 (finished her PhD in 2009). We'll see what happens, since lots of people are calling for her head. I'm not sure she'll be fired.
3) The other idiot lady -- Greek Life and Leadership Assistant Director Janna Basler -- has a salary 10k higher than the assistant professor. Administrative bloat at its finest.
4) People making death threats against absolutely anybody in these cases are really fucking immature and stupid.
The entire document from Concerned Students 1950s is about preventing a hostile/oppressive atmosphere to minorities. The protest is that preventative measures have not been taken. How can prevention be a strawman, it's what the protest is all about.
The Black experience on Mizzou’s campus is cornered in offices and rarely attended to until it reaches media. Then, and only then, do campus administrators seek reactionary initiatives to attest to the realities of oppressed students, faculty, and staff. These temporary adjustments to the university’s behaviors are not enough to assure that future generations of marginalized students will have a safe and inclusive learning experience during their time at Mizzou.[/I]
Because they need a straw man. They're the only ones talking prevention.
This board gets real ugly when it comes to defending racism. People will contort themselves all sort of ways to defend racism without appearing racist using free speech and anti-PC arguments.
Defending free speech is not defending racism. To say that defending free speech is defending racism is to misunderstand free speech. Defending free speech and opposing PC have nothing to do with racism, they are about freedom.
Defending free speech is not defending racism. To say that defending free speech is defending racism is to misunderstand free speech. Defending free speech and opposing PC have nothing to do with racism, they are about freedom.
Free speech is inclusive, but you can tell which free speech someone is defending by figuring out which free speech they aren't criticizing.
Wrong. You can tell which speech one is supporting by the speech one is using. The rest is speculation, in this case malicious speculation.
Defending free speech is not defending racism. To say that defending free speech is defending racism is to misunderstand free speech. Defending free speech and opposing PC have nothing to do with racism, they are about freedom.
Defending free speech is not defending racism. To say that defending free speech is defending racism is to misunderstand free speech. Defending free speech and opposing PC have nothing to do with racism, they are about freedom.
Don't try to censor my speech, bro.
Don't try to censor my speech, bro.
So by acknowledging prevention is all over the demands, are you now acknowledging that the protesters started this talk of prevention?I went back to the list.
1. Reaction
2. Reaction
3. Not sure what was presented in 1969
4. Both
5. Neither
6. Preventative
7. Both
8. Both