Jh doesn't need his own thread. Stop bitching.
And dg3 is a tool.
Someone's salty.
Jh doesn't need his own thread. Stop bitching.
And dg3 is a tool.
I don't know. That's why I asked. There are certainly people gaming the system, but I have no evidence to show any certain percentage nor do I know how to identify someone that's doing it.
I think it's going to be really difficult to identify it. It's probably a very subjective identification.
One would think that if it was as widespread as pubs claim that it is (see also: voter fraud), then it would manifest itself in a way that could be statistically measurable. After all, these agencies -govt, NPO, and private - collect tons of data. If economists can figure out the dynamics of drug and prostitution markets (see Levitt's work), I find it hard to believe that there's no way to investigate this.
Or, you could simply refer to the mountains of scholarship across disciplines that show that these phenomena are nowhere near as prevalent as the talking points suggest.
shrug
I agree. So in that case do you give up and throw out all entitlements? Seems like you drill into the numbers and find at least a ball park, an educated guess even.
Something.
I honestly just don't know what kind of information goes to the agencies. What does a welfare recipient have to report? Are they obligated to job search? Are there any obligations at all or does a X amount of money hit the account on X day each month?
Again, someone presents opposing viewpoints, you just lock them away? I've heard of these methods before.
Do you prefer to just have a circle jerk where you congratulate each other about how right you are? I thought being liberal meant you were open and inclusive of things that aren't just like you. I guess you draw the line at political ideology.
One would think that if it was as widespread as pubs claim that it is (see also: voter fraud), then it would manifest itself in a way that could be statistically measurable. After all, these agencies -govt, NPO, and private - collect tons of data. If economists can figure out the dynamics of drug and prostitution markets (see Levitt's work), I find it hard to believe that there's no way to investigate this.
Or, you could simply refer to the mountains of scholarship across disciplines that show that these phenomena are nowhere near as prevalent as the talking points suggest.
shrug
You guys and your fuggin stats. Don't need no damn stats. #whytry2016
I haven't been keeping up with the thread but it's good to know the Islamic dilemma is the same problem as the American dilemma. It all comes down to #parents
Your "everyone should have two parents but if they don't I don't have a plan for them" policy is platform item #1 on the #whytry2016 checklist
You seem smart/mature enough to know that that's not even close to the opinion dissenting from yours. Please leave this variety of garbage to others.
He's got nothing because there is nothing. All theories no data-based solutions
I honestly just don't know what kind of information goes to the agencies. What does a welfare recipient have to report? Are they obligated to job search? Are there any obligations at all or does a X amount of money hit the account on X day each month?
Let's not pretend that would matter. SJWs have a pretty good answer for widespread, statically measurable social problems they'd rather not confront. Blame that ish on privilege and move on.