Strickland33
Well-known member
So Huma's mother's and Hillary's husband's resumes and views - not Huma and Hillary's, which you remain quiet on - are your primary evidence that Clinton is not an advocate for women's rights?
That's a pretty backwards view of human agency, to be honest with you.
And I'm not disregarding the relationship. I commented on it directly. What did I say about it?
Drop the talking points and let's actually have a dialogue. You used to be better than this, man.
ETA: I find it humorous that "disproven" allegations for Trump clear him of wrongdoing, but "disproven" allegations for Clinton are further proof of her guilt. I use quotation marks because neither has been convicted or anything (at least that we have been talking about) and most of the proof - Clinton's congressional hearing(s) notwithstanding - appears to be hearsay.
That's a pretty backwards view of human agency, to be honest with you.
And I'm not disregarding the relationship. I commented on it directly. What did I say about it?
Drop the talking points and let's actually have a dialogue. You used to be better than this, man.
ETA: I find it humorous that "disproven" allegations for Trump clear him of wrongdoing, but "disproven" allegations for Clinton are further proof of her guilt. I use quotation marks because neither has been convicted or anything (at least that we have been talking about) and most of the proof - Clinton's congressional hearing(s) notwithstanding - appears to be hearsay.
Last edited: