Yep. We’d be hyped to get a player like him as a grad transfer. The only positive is that it will force Manning away from guard heavy lineups.
Yep. We’d be hyped to get a player like him as a grad transfer. The only positive is that it will force Manning away from guard heavy lineups.
Why did we start at 1-4? That was a season killer.
With the recent comments about Jamie Lewis, A Craw, BChill, Lewis, Wright 4 guard lineup is still possible. Throw in Chaundee, and it could be 5.
Yep. We’d be hyped to get a player like him as a grad transfer. The only positive is that it will force Manning away from guard heavy lineups.
There were some clear chemistry issues between Brandon, Woods, and Crawford. Definitely felt like one needed to go. That’s ultimately on Manning and the best option would have been for Woods to stay and Manning to figure out the chemistry stuff. But hopefully better chemistry and clearer defined roles will help offset the loss somewhat.
There were some clear chemistry issues between Brandon, Woods, and Crawford. Definitely felt like one needed to go. That’s ultimately on Manning and the best option would have been for Woods to stay and Manning to figure out the chemistry stuff. But hopefully better chemistry and clearer defined roles will help offset the loss somewhat.
Manning defines the roles.
Yup. But it’s easier to define roles when their are fewer roles to define.
Fewer roles? Still 5 players on the court at a time next year.
It's pretty awesome that we're discussing the benefits of losing a rising 5th-year senior because it might force our coach to recognize the downside of playing too many guards.