• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

First Charges Filed in Mueller Investigation

I'm pretty sure that this was leaked only because Mueller and Co. already know the answer to all of the questions related to content (e.g., "What happened during X meeting on X date?") and are looking to see if Trump will be forthcoming and honest (lol). All the rest of the questions related to Trump's thought processes and purpose/intent are likely just trap questions to catch Trump saying one thing to one question and another thing to a later question.
 
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...mey-huma-abedin-investigation-0430-story.html

The more Mueller searches for hypothetical lawbreaking, the more he is inadvertently underscoring that actual lawbreakers must be subject to the same standard of justice. Ironically, Mueller's investigation has reminded America that it is past time to call Comey, McCabe, and a host of Obama-era DOJ and FBI officials to account.

For over a year, we have had two standards of legality when there can only be one. A reckoning is near.
Click to expand...
 
A year ago, I still held out hope that sailor would realize he's embarrassing himself by holding on to obvious lies to protect his obsession with Hillary. There's no hope now.
 
sailordeac said:
1

such as?
Click to expand...

A tweet that begins with “1/“ is a thread. Click on it and you’ll get the first tweet of a series of tweets that expand upon the point made in the first tweet. In this case, the tweeter lists factual errors in the article you posted.
 
PhDeac said:
A tweet that begins with “1/“ is a thread. Click on it and you’ll get the first tweet of a series of tweets that expand upon the point made in the first tweet. In this case, the tweeter lists factual errors in the article you posted.
Click to expand...

Thanks. Mariotti needs better arguments/opinions than the ones he has stated.
 
Facts? Opinions? Fiction?

Apparently there’s no meaningful difference in the crazy world inhabited by “conservatives”.
 
"
Victor Hanson's rambling opinion piece of unproven and unsubstantiated accusations seems to be a hyperactive conspiracy theorist's wet dream."

Sailor as exhibit #1.
​
 
He didn't even touch on the laughable comparison of the attorney-client privilege in these two cases. Cohen entered into non-disclosure agreements that he claimed he was not acting on behalf of trump and Trump claims cohen was not acting as his attorney. How in the world could that be covered by an attorney-client privilege?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top